fundamentalism:
Category: Chatter
This is really off-topic for GM/BM, but I just can't resist mocking the astonishing stupidity of the Conservapedia folks. I'm sure you've heard by now that Andy Schafly and his pals are working on a "new translation" of the...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 2:55 PM • 62 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
I normally try to ignore things like this, but this is just too funny. In general, I find arguments like this to be extremely silly. This is, basically, like playing with gematria - only instead of doing real gematria...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 3:29 PM • 101 Comments •
Category: fundamentalism
Another piece of junk that I received: "The Invisible Link Between Mathematics and Theology", by a guy named "Ladislav Kvasz", published in a rag called "Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith". (I'm not going to quote much from this,...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 4:34 PM • 32 Comments •
Category: Debunking Creationism
Fellow SBer Tara from Aetiology pointed me at this bit of inanity, which I can't resist mocking: The mystery of the human genome has come into clearer focus as scientists have discovered that each individual person is at least ten...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 3:35 PM • 40 Comments •
Category: Debunking Creationism
So, as promised, it's time for part two of "The Creationists and the Shrinking Sun". The second main tack of the creationists and the shrinking sun is to not use the bare measurements of an allegedly shrinking sun as their...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 5:27 PM • 33 Comments •
Category: bad physics
One of the more pathetic examples of bad math from the creationist camp is an argument based on the claim that the sun is shrinking. This argument has been thoroughly debunked by other folks, so I haven't bothered to add...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 5:26 PM • 31 Comments •
Category: Debunking Creationism
The stupidity and innumeracy of Americans, and in particular American fundamentalists, never ceases to astound me. Recently on Yahoo, some bozo posted something claiming that the bible was all correct, and that genetics would show that bats were actually birds....
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 11:00 AM • 118 Comments •
Category: bad math
This weekend, I came across Granville Sewell's article "A Mathematicians View of Evolution". My goodness, but what a wretched piece of dreck! I thought I'd take a moment to point out just how bad it is. This article, as described...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 9:45 AM • 75 Comments •
Category: bad math
A reader sent me a link to this amusing blog. It's by a guy named George Shollenberger, who claims to have devised The First scientific Proof of God (and yes, he always capitalizes it like that). George suffers from some...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 1:48 PM • 51 Comments •
Category: fundamentalism
Last night, a reader sent me a link to yet another wretched attempt to argue for the existence of God using Bayesian probability. I really hate that. Over the years, I've learned to dread Bayesian arguments, because so many of...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 4:10 PM • 37 Comments •