Now on ScienceBlogs: Publishers Weekly Cover Girl: Rebecca Skloot and The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (HeLa)

Seed Media Group

Search

Profile

41px-face.jpg Maria Brumm has a Master's degree... in Earth Science! She lives in Seattle, WA, where she works in environmental consulting.

Opinions expressed on Green Gabbro are well-reasoned and insightful. Needless to say, they are not those of my employers, Seed Media Group, or anyone on my thesis committee. Disclaimers expressed on this blog may be those of the Whad'Ya Know? quiz show.

Email: criminy.crickets [at] gmail [dot] com

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

Let's all consume media together! Here's what I'm reading and what I'm listening to.

Subscribe to Green Gabbro

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Posts

LiveJournal: green_gabbro_sb

« Friday Rock Blogging: Slag | Main | RIP Ed Lorenz »

Women in Science Linky-Post

Category: GenderLinks
Posted on: April 16, 2008 7:06 AM, by Maria Brumm

My beautifully kludgy little script that does much of the work of putting together linky-posts for me - pulling everything with a special "to SB" tag off my del.icio.us account and formatting it - has stopped working. I cry tears of sadness. I also have a backlog of links.

Like, f'rinstance, April's Scientiae carnival. And the announcement for next month's Scientiae carnival - I'm excited about the theme!

And a couple of things on the social status of women in relation to geology: A Broadsheet summary of this article (pdf) about how oil and mineral-resource economies are bad for women. The kernel of the argument is this: "when growth encourages women to join the formal labor market, it ultimately brings about greater gender equality; when growth is based on oil and mineral extraction, it discourages women from entering the labor force and tends to exaggerate gender inequalities." There's also an article in Advances in Geosciences about women's role in social adaption to climate change.

MOAR LINKS under teh foldz NOM NOM.

The Angry Black Woman has called for a Carnival of Allies:

Is it easier to understand oppression, to move past guilt and on to useful dialogue, etc., if the person explaining these things to you in-depth is a person like yourself? White or male or straight or Christian or whatever? I don't know. But as this is the Internet, it should be easy to figure out.

Posts are due May 5, see ABW's post for details.

Renée Bergland reviewed wrote a biography of 19th Century astronomer Maria Mitchell, and was surprised that it's not a story about a woman who triumphs against the forces of oppression:

On one hand, it's exciting to realize that there was a time (not that long ago) when a girl like the young Maria Mitchell grew up believing that there was nothing preventing her from achieving scientific greatness. On the other hand, it's a bit discouraging to realize that when I was born in New York City in the late twentieth century, the odds were worse for girls in astronomy than they had been when Mitchell was born on Nantucket more than a hundred and fifty years before. To add to the depression factor, I worried that uncovering Mitchell's advantages might make her achievements seem less impressive.

Finally, this is way old, but that loyalty oath thing? The teacher got her job back.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/69656

Comments

1

Thanks for the link to the Renee Bergland piece! One correction, though--she didn't review the biography, she wrote it. I hadn't even considered that the post could come off as a review, but I now see how "When I started my book on the nineteenth-century scientist Maria Mitchell" could be interpreted in more than one way.

Thanks again, and I hope you'll keep reading Beacon Broadside.

Jessica Bennett Blog Editor, Beacon Broadside

Posted by: Jessica Bennett | April 16, 2008 9:18 AM

2

Whoops! That's what I get for posting while tired. Thanks for the correction!

Posted by: Maria | April 16, 2008 1:35 PM

3

I'm glad the loyalty oath deal was resolved, except they're still making people sign loyalty oaths. They just let this one slide because she had a union behind her and (probably) belonged to a religion that was respectable.

Posted by: delagar | April 16, 2008 2:29 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM