How people respond to the U.S. government's attempts to censor some war-related images comes down to whether or not they are supporters of President Bush, a new study suggests.Researchers at Ohio State University surveyed 600 people and asked them if they were interested in viewing photos or videos of the caskets containing dead U.S. soldiers arriving in the United States from Iraq and Afghanistan .
The catch was that, prior to being asked whether they wanted to view the images, half of the survey respondents were told about a U.S. government policy which prevents the widespread dissemination of such images through the media.
One prominent psychological theory suggests that when people are told they can't see something, they want to see it even more.
"This is not at all what we found," said Andrew Hayes, an associate professor of communication at Ohio State University and one of the authors of the study.
In general, Bush supporters expressed less interest in viewing these images than respondents who didn't support Bush in the 2004 election. However, how Bush supporters responded was affected by whether they were first told about the policy.
Among Bush supporters first told about the policy, only 28 percent expressed some interest in viewing the images, after adjusting for the influence of such factors as the respondent's age, sex, and education. However, among Bush supporters who were not first told about the policy, 49 percent expressed some interest. So being told about the policy reduced rather than increased Bush supporters' interest in seeing the images, Hayes said.In contrast, 70 percent of people who didn't support Bush in the 2004 election expressed interest in seeing the images, regardless of whether or not they were told about the policy.
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- Rich Wilson on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- JenW on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- MartinDH on Noachian Flood Reconstructed
- Karen Burke on w00t!!!! Rebecca and her book written up in Publishers Weekly
- katydid13 on Dear public school principals everywhere
- BdN on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- Greg Laden on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- Greg Laden on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- JGlenn on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- henry harpending on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- w00t!!!! Rebecca and her book written up in Publishers Weekly
- Has swine flu peaked, and it if has, what does that mean?
- New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- How do you explain evolution?
- You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- Dear public school principals everywhere
- Managing your References
- Noachian Flood Reconstructed
- The Corporation Part 15
- Cobra vs. Python: Who would win?
« Harvard Mind Survey: Meet the Politicians! | Main | There are still mysteries »
Big Surprise: Bushies Are Bushies
Category: Politics
Posted on: December 11, 2007 6:11 PM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in: 
Brain & Behavior
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/58116
Comments
I'm sure he's onto something, but I don't understand why he didn't (as appears to be the case) gather other data than just support of Bush. It suggests he's more interested in making a political statement than actually finding out something interesting about political psychology.
Also, he seems to overstate the results, by saying people's attitudes "depend" on their feelings towards Bush, which suggests a relationship of causality.
Posted by: Zach Alexander | December 12, 2007 6:10 PM