Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

Archives

Recent Posts

« New Glyptodont Species | Main | If you are going to go on a first date, you should make sure your bowels are healthy »

Larry King: Bill Nye vs. Richard Lindzen

Category: Global Warming
Posted on: December 12, 2007 8:47 PM, by Greg Laden

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/58196

Comments

1

All I heard is that, in the future, we're all rich. I can turn my thermostat back up now.

Posted by: Ex-drone | December 12, 2007 11:06 PM

2

Gah? My brain is oozing out of my ears. Nice of that guy to quote Crichton though... that's a reliable source. Comparable to Tom Clancy being interviewed as a "Terrorism Expert" on 9/11 (Which he was).

Posted by: Jonathan | December 13, 2007 2:13 AM

3

I remember that! Yea, exactly, it is the same thing.

M.C. is actually a very smart guy but I'm sad to say he has become increasingly misguided.

Posted by: Greg Laden | December 13, 2007 7:20 AM

4

Lindzen is remarkably grounded and mundane in addressing the science. What Bill Nye is spouting is really wild exaggerations and guesses not supported by the current science (like the thermohaline, etc.)

Posted by: Ram K | December 19, 2007 8:32 AM

5

I would strongly disagree that the thermohaline problem is not supported by current science. It is very much a factor. The system is pretty complex, but the conveyor currents are real, and their operation is linked to climate.

Posted by: Greg Laden | December 19, 2007 11:06 AM

6

Climate always plays a factor, but to what degree is the question. The science is just not there to predict drastic alterations by human of the thermohaline or the Gulfstream. I just have to weep for science when such alarming statements are made.

Posted by: Ram K | December 19, 2007 3:01 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM