Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« New Glyptodont Species | Main | If you are going to go on a first date, you should make sure your bowels are healthy »

Larry King: Bill Nye vs. Richard Lindzen

Category: Global Warming
Posted on: December 12, 2007 8:47 PM, by Greg Laden

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Environment

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/58196

Comments

1

All I heard is that, in the future, we're all rich. I can turn my thermostat back up now.

Posted by: Ex-drone | December 12, 2007 11:06 PM

2

Gah? My brain is oozing out of my ears. Nice of that guy to quote Crichton though... that's a reliable source. Comparable to Tom Clancy being interviewed as a "Terrorism Expert" on 9/11 (Which he was).

Posted by: Jonathan | December 13, 2007 2:13 AM

3

I remember that! Yea, exactly, it is the same thing.

M.C. is actually a very smart guy but I'm sad to say he has become increasingly misguided.

Posted by: Greg Laden | December 13, 2007 7:20 AM

4

Lindzen is remarkably grounded and mundane in addressing the science. What Bill Nye is spouting is really wild exaggerations and guesses not supported by the current science (like the thermohaline, etc.)

Posted by: Ram K | December 19, 2007 8:32 AM

5

I would strongly disagree that the thermohaline problem is not supported by current science. It is very much a factor. The system is pretty complex, but the conveyor currents are real, and their operation is linked to climate.

Posted by: Greg Laden | December 19, 2007 11:06 AM

6

Climate always plays a factor, but to what degree is the question. The science is just not there to predict drastic alterations by human of the thermohaline or the Gulfstream. I just have to weep for science when such alarming statements are made.

Posted by: Ram K | December 19, 2007 3:01 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.