Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Topi or not Topi ... | Main | Academic uncovers Holy Grail of palaeontology »

Microsoft softens? I think not...

Category: Technology
Posted on: December 4, 2007 8:09 PM, by Greg Laden

Microsoft Softens Response to Piracy from PhysOrg.com
(AP) -- Microsoft Corp. is pulling back from a system that disables programs on users' computers if it suspects the software is pirated, opting instead for a gentler approach based on nagging alerts.

[...]


Whenever Microsoft Softens you know something or someone is about to get bit....

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/57394

Comments

1

MicroSOFT?

Posted by: Coturnix | December 4, 2007 9:37 PM

2

That's in Windows Vista, and Microsoft claim it has cut piracy of the OS. It probably hasn't occurred to them that anyone computer-savvy enough to install an OS would probably avoid Vista in the first place.

Apparently Windows Genuine Advantage was getting a healthy number of false-positives leading to annoyed users making support calls. This new 'gentler approach' is mainly for Microsoft's benefit: if there were no false-positives in WGA, I suspect that MS would have happily stayed the course.

Posted by: Barry | December 4, 2007 9:43 PM

3

There was a version of Windows 2000 that did this: If you changed a couple of pieces of hardware, like added a new hard drive and upgraded your memory, the system would detect this and assume that it was not on the same computer it was on when it went to sleep the day before .... indicating that Norton Image or some other piece of software had been used to pirate it, I assume.

The software would then tell you to kiss its ass, and that you did not own it anymore. There was a number you could call and maybe they would give you a code to let you reinstate your status. Happened to me a couple of times.

Posted by: Greg Laden | December 4, 2007 10:35 PM

4

That's XP, surely? To my knowledge product activation wasn't in any version of Windows 2000 -- I recently transplanted a W2K Professional hard drive between two quite different systems, and aside from a heap of driver issues there were no other problems.

(On the same day I transplanted a Debian hard drive between two even more different systems, and impressively it just worked).

Posted by: Barry | December 4, 2007 11:43 PM

5

Barrry, my memory was that this was prior to product activation and XP. I was not product activation ... installation was normal, and this would happen later. But, I could be wrong. It did not happen on all versions of whatever operating system it was.

Posted by: Greg Laden | December 5, 2007 8:31 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.