Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- dan on Karen Armstrong: 2008 TED Prize wish: Charter for Compassion
- Katherine on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- flynn on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- Jason Thibeault on Happy Birthday Carl Sagan
- Richard on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Jason Thibeault on Dear public school principals everywhere
- Nevyn on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Jay on Dear public school principals everywhere
- Sivi on Islamic Creationism in the News
- Dorid on How to cook a turkey
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- Happy Birthday Carl Sagan
- How to cook a turkey
- w00t!!!! Rebecca and her book written up in Publishers Weekly
- Has swine flu peaked, and it if has, what does that mean?
- New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- How do you explain evolution?
- You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- Dear public school principals everywhere
- Managing your References
- Noachian Flood Reconstructed
« Blogospherics: Recommended reads | Main | Reduced Verbal Ability in African American Children »
Hitchens vs Souza
Category: Creationism
Posted on: December 19, 2007 4:49 PM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in: 
Politics
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/58923
Comments
Hitchens really does seem to try to mess with the format here and he does seem to be really rude in this and his rudeness allows Souza to look better. Hitchen scores some good points but Souza does really come out ahead. Souza ignores Hitchen's point about how early facism was connected to Christianity, but does come out well with his comments on later dictatorships. Souza's comparison however to the Inquisition should strike anyone watching as immediately bad for one simple reason; the world population was much smaller then and humans were in many ways not as well organized.
Hitchens in general seems to be making what I would see as a critical error here that he seems to frequently miss (and PZ actually seems to get): the argument that religion causes evil isn't necessary. The argument that people are about as bad with religion as without is sufficient. It is a much easier argument to make and it has almost identical consequences.
All of that said, debating this sort of issue to a large extent at all implicitly accepts the fallacy of the appeal-to- consequences. Whether or not religion is good overall is not very relevant to whether or not some religion is correct (I say not very relevant rather than irrelevant due to a simply hypothetical- imagine if a certain religion believed that there was divine intervention to keep their true believers moral and the religion had a significant number of people and the fraction of that religion that was convicted of crimes was very tiny. Then the appeal-to-consequences isn't an appeal to consequences but a test of divine intervention).
Overall though I really think Hitchen's needs to work on his debate presentation and rhetoric.
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | December 19, 2007 10:55 PM