Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Search this blog
Profile
My name is Greg Laden. You can find out about me here, contact me here, and for all the gory details, have a look at this...
Recent Posts
- McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- Einstein the Parrot: Talking and squawking
- Ike: Yikes!!!
- The Impeachment of Webster Cook (Crackergate)
- Roy Zimmerman is NOT Bob Zimmerman. He's funnier. Otherwise he's exactly the same.
- The High Water Mark of the Bush Presidency
- Ory Okolloh: The making of an African activist
- Sarah Palin's Pastor Problem
- Another Day in the Life of The Twin Cities
- Google Chrome Not Ready for Real OS Deployment
Recent Comments
- Dunc on Google Chrome Not Ready for Real OS Deployment
- tincture on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- articulett on The Impeachment of Webster Cook (Crackergate)
- Joel on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- Joel on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- tincture on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- tincture on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- Joel on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- Stephanie Z on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
- Joel on McCain Supporter Abramoff: Four More Years! (In jail)
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Blogroll
« Blogospherics: Recommended reads | Main | Reduced Verbal Ability in African American Children »
Hitchens vs Souza
Category: Creationism
Posted on: December 19, 2007 4:49 PM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in: 
Politics
Comments
Hitchens really does seem to try to mess with the format here and he does seem to be really rude in this and his rudeness allows Souza to look better. Hitchen scores some good points but Souza does really come out ahead. Souza ignores Hitchen's point about how early facism was connected to Christianity, but does come out well with his comments on later dictatorships. Souza's comparison however to the Inquisition should strike anyone watching as immediately bad for one simple reason; the world population was much smaller then and humans were in many ways not as well organized.
Hitchens in general seems to be making what I would see as a critical error here that he seems to frequently miss (and PZ actually seems to get): the argument that religion causes evil isn't necessary. The argument that people are about as bad with religion as without is sufficient. It is a much easier argument to make and it has almost identical consequences.
All of that said, debating this sort of issue to a large extent at all implicitly accepts the fallacy of the appeal-to- consequences. Whether or not religion is good overall is not very relevant to whether or not some religion is correct (I say not very relevant rather than irrelevant due to a simply hypothetical- imagine if a certain religion believed that there was divine intervention to keep their true believers moral and the religion had a significant number of people and the fraction of that religion that was convicted of crimes was very tiny. Then the appeal-to-consequences isn't an appeal to consequences but a test of divine intervention).
Overall though I really think Hitchen's needs to work on his debate presentation and rhetoric.
Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | December 19, 2007 10:55 PM