Thoughtful analysis on a recent poll regarding Evolution vs. Creationism.
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Looking for stuff about birds?
Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.
Lean more about lions
An archaeological expedition to the Congo
The Skeptical Search Engine
The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.
Recent Comments
- Donald Iljazi on What is Markdown and why use it?
- freewebcoach.org on Changing the rep of Fungi one mushroom-based robot thingie-builder at a time
- Greg Laden on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
- Charles on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
- Greg Laden on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
- Greg Laden on Seismic Activity at Yellowstone
- Connie Davis on Who has a higher IQ, cats or dogs?
- lynda on Seismic Activity at Yellowstone
- lynda on Seismic Activity at Yellowstone
- Don Parnell on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
Search
Profile
Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.
Recent Posts
- Looking for stuff about birds?
- Environmentally Friendly Hard Drive Case
- Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882
- Whitney Houston has died
- Lions!
- Changing the rep of Fungi one mushroom-based robot thingie-builder at a time
- More Mississippi Meanderings
- Is climate change a leftist scientific conspiracy to destroy America?
- Oldest Animals Discovered in Namibia
- Wild Mississippi
Blogroll
If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*- 10,000 Birds
- Alpha Meme
- a Nadder!
- Angry by Choice
- Armchair Dissident
- (((Billy))) The Atheist
- blogfish
- blogSci
- Blond Nonbeliever
- Blue Lion Blog
- Bug Girl's Blog
- Camels with Hammers
- Catalogue of Oganisms
- Cassandra's Tears
- Class M Planet
- Cocktail Party Physics
- Counter Minds
- Cranky Linguist, The
- Crowded Head, Cozy Bed
- Dead Racist Society
- Deep Sea News
- Dispersal of Darwin
- Divine Afflatus
- Dread Tomato Addiction
- Evil is Underrated
- Evolved and Rational
- Evolving in Kansas
- Evolving Thoughts
- Fellman Studio Blog
- Flying Trilobite
- Further Thoughts
- Hoxful Monsters
- ICBS Everywhere
- Illusory Tenant
- It's Alive!!
- Jafcisa
- Letters from a Broad
- Life Before Death
- Looking For Detachment
- Matharu's Rants and Raves
- Mors dei
- Natural Reckonings
- Nature Blog Network
- Providentia
- Qeyḥ bāḥrī
- Quiche Moraine
- Religion, Sets, and Politics
- Sandwalk
- Sarah Zielinski
- Science Notes
- The Seething Primate
- Skepchick
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Splendid Elles
- Survival Machine
- Synapostasy
- TalkOrigins
- Tangled Up in Blue Guy
- Tetrapod Zoology
- The Flying Trilobite
- The Inoculated Mind
- The Intersection
- The Loom (new)
- The Scientific Activist
- The Unexamined Life..
- The Zone
- Thinking for Free
- Think Progress
- Three Toed Sloth
- Toomanytribbles
- Traumatized by Truth
- Truth Is a Woman
- udreamofjanie
- Uncommon Liberty
- View from the Pond
- Vickie Henderson Art
- When Pigs Fly Returns
- Writer's Daily Grind
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
« Eland | Main | Obama Kicks Butt in Iowa »
Evo Creo Poll
Category: Creation Science • Creationism • Evolution • Intelligent Design
Posted on: January 3, 2008 10:20 PM, by Greg Laden
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60281


Comments
I completely understand what he means about being embarrassed. One thing I would like to point out, though: How many of these people who answer the poll are being completely honest as opposed to either 1) parroting what they believe the status quo is or 2) wanting to project a certain image about the U.S. or themselves (e.g., want people to know that the U.S. is a "good Christian country"). As a budding statistician, I can tell you that one question to which the response is almost always an exaggeration is "How often do you attend religious ceremonies?" Except for those who actually do attend once or more per week (I forget roughly how great that is) or who are atheist and never attend, a very significant number lie.
Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2008 5:47 AM
JJ: Would 'most of them' qualify as 'a very significant number'?
I live in Los Angeles County in a suburb where parking is at a premium. If people would leave their homes in large numbers Sunday morning to go to church, they ought to be visible, right? If they walked, we'd see a horde of pedestrians. If they drove, we'd see a sudden surge in available parking spaces, and the 'unchurched' would be out there in force to take advantage and upgrade to better spots.
Neither of these happen. There is no discernible difference between Saturday morning and Sunday morning. Ergo, at least out here on the Left Coast, the bulk of people lie about their church attendance.
Posted by: Nelson Muntz | January 4, 2008 6:08 AM
Nelson, you actually made me break out the paper I wrote a couple years ago based on 2004 GSS data. The question is, "How often respondent attends religious services." Roughly 18% of respondents said they went once per week (I'm looking at a chart and not raw data, that's why I say "roughly") and about 8% say they go more than once per week. "Never" is a healthy 17% or so.
As I don't want to dump a lot of data, I'll just kind of give very minimal, informal results here. If you regress that variable with the faith of the respondents, you find that being black (coeff = 1.37) or female (0.53) or Islam (.52) corresponded most with increased religious attendance, and being irreligious (-2.897) or other religion (-2.118) or Buddhist (-1.53) corresponded most with decreased religious attendance. The differences between male and female, and white and black (there's also a category "other") are very significant (p
Also those who are divorced and separated are (much) less likely to attend religious services (again, p far less than 0.05)
Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2008 7:27 AM
At the risk of seeming like I'm spamming this post, I like that last bit about the divorced/separated result so much, I actually grabbed the chart from my paper and posted it here:
http://www.statops.com/files/religstatus.gif
Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2008 7:39 AM