Thoughtful analysis on a recent poll regarding Evolution vs. Creationism.
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- flynn on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- Jason Thibeault on Happy Birthday Carl Sagan
- Richard on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Jason Thibeault on Dear public school principals everywhere
- Nevyn on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Jay on Dear public school principals everywhere
- Sivi on Islamic Creationism in the News
- Dorid on How to cook a turkey
- JenW on How to cook a turkey
- jj on New Physics Theory Explains ... More than we Want to Know
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- Happy Birthday Carl Sagan
- How to cook a turkey
- w00t!!!! Rebecca and her book written up in Publishers Weekly
- Has swine flu peaked, and it if has, what does that mean?
- New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- How do you explain evolution?
- You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- Dear public school principals everywhere
- Managing your References
- Noachian Flood Reconstructed
« Eland | Main | Obama Kicks Butt in Iowa »
Evo Creo Poll
Category: Creation Science • Creationism • Evolution • Intelligent Design
Posted on: January 3, 2008 10:20 PM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in:
Politics
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60281







Comments
I completely understand what he means about being embarrassed. One thing I would like to point out, though: How many of these people who answer the poll are being completely honest as opposed to either 1) parroting what they believe the status quo is or 2) wanting to project a certain image about the U.S. or themselves (e.g., want people to know that the U.S. is a "good Christian country"). As a budding statistician, I can tell you that one question to which the response is almost always an exaggeration is "How often do you attend religious ceremonies?" Except for those who actually do attend once or more per week (I forget roughly how great that is) or who are atheist and never attend, a very significant number lie.
Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2008 5:47 AM
JJ: Would 'most of them' qualify as 'a very significant number'?
I live in Los Angeles County in a suburb where parking is at a premium. If people would leave their homes in large numbers Sunday morning to go to church, they ought to be visible, right? If they walked, we'd see a horde of pedestrians. If they drove, we'd see a sudden surge in available parking spaces, and the 'unchurched' would be out there in force to take advantage and upgrade to better spots.
Neither of these happen. There is no discernible difference between Saturday morning and Sunday morning. Ergo, at least out here on the Left Coast, the bulk of people lie about their church attendance.
Posted by: Nelson Muntz | January 4, 2008 6:08 AM
Nelson, you actually made me break out the paper I wrote a couple years ago based on 2004 GSS data. The question is, "How often respondent attends religious services." Roughly 18% of respondents said they went once per week (I'm looking at a chart and not raw data, that's why I say "roughly") and about 8% say they go more than once per week. "Never" is a healthy 17% or so.
As I don't want to dump a lot of data, I'll just kind of give very minimal, informal results here. If you regress that variable with the faith of the respondents, you find that being black (coeff = 1.37) or female (0.53) or Islam (.52) corresponded most with increased religious attendance, and being irreligious (-2.897) or other religion (-2.118) or Buddhist (-1.53) corresponded most with decreased religious attendance. The differences between male and female, and white and black (there's also a category "other") are very significant (p
Also those who are divorced and separated are (much) less likely to attend religious services (again, p far less than 0.05)
Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2008 7:27 AM
At the risk of seeming like I'm spamming this post, I like that last bit about the divorced/separated result so much, I actually grabbed the chart from my paper and posted it here:
http://www.statops.com/files/religstatus.gif
Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2008 7:39 AM