Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

Archives

Recent Posts

« Pope Evicts Astronomers | Main | News: britney spears latest, and the Idaho Caucus (or Iowa, or whatever) »

Huckabee On Evolution

Category: CreationismPolitics
Posted on: January 4, 2008 6:00 PM, by Greg Laden

In the wake of his Iowa victory, Mike Huckabee is doing the news and talk show circuit. Here are his comments this AM on evolution.


ABC's "Good Morning America" grilled Huckabee about his evangelical ties, making Creationism the issue.

ABC's Robin Roberts mentioned a new book from the National Academy of Sciences that says Creationism has no place in the classroom -- given the overwhelming evidence in favor of evolution.

"Do you agree with that -- that Creationism should be kept out of our classrooms," Roberts asked.

"In ten-and-a-half years as a governor, I never touched it," Huckabee said. "It's not an issue for a president. It wasn't even an issue for me as a governor, and governors do deal with education - but not the curriculum." Huckabee said his focus as governor was on music and arts in education.

"Should creationism be banned from the classroom, yes or no?" Roberts persisted.

"Banned? Well, banning sounds like sort of a censorship," Huckabee said. "I don't think most people agree with censorship. Should we teach it as a doctrine? Of course not. Should we teach that some people believe it, some don't? I think that's academic freedom."

[source]

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60327

Comments

1

Should we teach arithmetic as a doctrine? Spelling as a doctrine?

Shouldn't there be equal time for the alternatives -- innumeracy and illiteracy?

Posted by: Ken Shabby | January 4, 2008 6:29 PM

2

Looking in as a total ousider (secular humanist Irish cancer researcher in Sweden) I get the impression that the real danger to US science from Huckabee is not an active plan to implement the wedge strategy but rather indirect consequences of continuing to have a right wing religious figure in charge. For instance the US supreme court is rather finely balanced at the moment and another Scalia-like appointment may result in decisions that seriously erode your separation of church and state policy.

Posted by: Sigmund | January 4, 2008 7:03 PM

3

Followup question:

"So, Governor, should we consider your position pandering, or ignorance?

Do you feel the same way about geocentrism? Flat earth?

Posted by: Anon | January 4, 2008 8:13 PM

4

It's just one more concept that Huckleberry is unclear on. I guess music and arts are important in education, but not science.

Posted by: mark | January 4, 2008 8:41 PM

5

You can fiddle while your country burns?????

Posted by: anonymousat2:11 | January 5, 2008 4:12 AM

6

sig: I think you are exactly right.

Posted by: greg laden | January 5, 2008 7:06 AM

7

Huckabee is not unclear at all in his position: "Should we teach that some people believe it, some don't? I think that's academic freedom."

That is coded speech for " Teach the Controversy", i.e teach "both sides" as if religion is a side.

Posted by: the real cmf | January 8, 2008 12:11 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM