Now on ScienceBlogs: Q: How do you sex a Smilodon? (A: Very carefully)

Seed Media Group

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Blogroll

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
openlab08-submit.150.png



open_access_day_blog_award.jpg

Archives

Recent Posts

« Four Stone Hearth Blog Carnival 33 | Main | Biology of Color Preference »

John Edwards will drop out of race this PM

Category: Politics
Posted on: January 30, 2008 10:30 AM, by Greg Laden

... according to news reports flying around the airwaves.

It will be interesting to see what happens to those currently supporting him. It is likely that if Edwards does not endorse anyone, his supporters would drift to Clinton, since it is believed that Edwards has been collecting the whiter among the white votes (those who would never vote for a black man). On the other hand, those individuals may also never vote for a woman, especially a Clinton.

So, perhaps many of Edward's supporters would drift to out of the primary race entirely, and then go for the Republican nominee during the General Election. Depending, of course, on who that nominee is.

Edwards will likely make his announcement at 1:00 PM EST today. That announcement, and the next seven days, will be very interesting indeed.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/62718

Comments

1

I'll be going with Obama from this point on, but let's hope that in Minnesota people are still inspired to come to caucuses for Al Franken.

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | January 30, 2008 11:59 AM

2

Crap, I missed the speech. Did anybody hear it?

Posted by: Greg Laden | January 30, 2008 2:06 PM

4

"drift to out... entirely, and then go for the Republican nominee"
Sure, but you mentioned that already: Hillary Clinton is a Republican the last time I checked ;-)

Posted by: the real cmf | January 30, 2008 4:57 PM

6

I liked Edwards because he seemed smarter and more progressive than the other two, not because of his genetics.

I can't imagine there's more than a handful of Democrats that find both Obama and Hillary so repugnant that they'd vote for any of the Republicans. Ron Paul is the only one not promising more of the same, and even he's a total wackjob.

Posted by: Bob | January 30, 2008 8:13 PM

7

Why oh why.

Edwards and Gravel were my favorite dems.

Posted by: Louis B. | January 30, 2008 8:36 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM