Now on ScienceBlogs: Publishers Weekly Cover Girl: Rebecca Skloot and The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks (HeLa)

Seed Media Group

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Blogroll

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
openlab08-submit.150.png



open_access_day_blog_award.jpg

Archives

Recent Posts

« Florida: The Whole World is Watching | Main | Likely Voters Prefer Evolution Over Creationism »

Microsoft Blocks Older File Formats

Category: OpenSource
Posted on: January 3, 2008 12:00 PM, by Greg Laden

A good way to make Microsoft Office software not interact with other software, thus forcing users to either shun the alternatives or to use only the alternatives would be to start blocking the use of all older file formats. Let's hope Microsoft does not think of this nasty little trick.

"In Service Pack 3 for Office 2003, Microsoft disabled support for many older file formats. If you have old Word, Excel, 1-2-3, Quattro, or Corel Draw documents, watch out! They did this because the old formats are 'less secure', which actually makes some sense, but only if you got the files from some untrustworthy source. Naturally, they did this by default, and then documented a mind-bogglingly complex workaround (KB 938810) rather than providing a user interface for adjusting it, or even a set of awkward 'Do you really want to do this?' dialog boxes to click through. And of course because these are, after all, old file formats ... many users will encounter the problem only months or years after the software change, while groping around in dusty and now-inaccessible archives."

[source]

Ooops.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60199

Comments

1

Oh, but the market doesn't produce any monopolies and anyway, it wouldn't be abused...


Or so I heard.

Posted by: student_b | January 3, 2008 12:51 PM

2

If the source for the code that reads your data is not open, those who control that source can hold your data for ransom.

Posted by: llewelly | January 3, 2008 1:30 PM

3

I remember years ago the Gutenberg project used to have a nice position paper on why they required everything to be in just ASCII -- because it was the only format that they had any faith might still be readable in 10, 20, 40, or 80 years. Meanwhile, everybody is wondering why you don't just use Word, or RTF.... Well, even though people never seemed to take the "I'm on Linux, I can't fully read those formats" objection seriously, they ought to take *this* seriously.

Posted by: Rob Knop | January 3, 2008 5:30 PM

4

I can't imagine why those who might possibly want their data to be accessible in 50 years might prefer Open Document as a format over Word's...

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | January 3, 2008 9:27 PM

5

John: I know what you mean.

I used to have a list of people like that. Can't lay my hands on the list anymore, though, it was stored in an early Microsoft Access database. There is no modern software that will read that format anymore...

Posted by: greg laden | January 3, 2008 9:44 PM

6

I guess this is a desperate last ditch attempt to provide a compelling reason to upgrade... I still reckon Word has been going downhill ever since '97.

Posted by: Dunc | January 4, 2008 4:47 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM