Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« News: britney spears latest, and the Idaho Caucus (or Iowa, or whatever) | Main | The Best Analysis I've Seen of Iowa »

New Open Access Paleontology Journal

Posted on: January 4, 2008 8:13 PM, by Greg Laden

Its name is, unfortunately, "Open Paleontology Journal." Reminds me of the Soviet/Communist Era in Asia, where such a journal might have been named "The People's Paleontology Journal."

Details are here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60318

Comments

1

It's no people's journal; more a vanity publisher (you pay to publish). The link on their homepage doesn't work, so it looks as if they have nothing to publish yet. Looks like a hopper onto the PloS bandwagon.

And they can't spell palaeontology correctly, either. They probably even pronounce it paley-ontology.

Still, I'll try them out with my hypothesis that Jurassic and Cretaceous ammonites are really the remains of small mammmoths with very curly tusks- if I can still find the paper under overlying strata of even more junk.

They probably have to pay peer-reviewers, handsomely, but I'll slip mine past by getting a couple of my creationist paley-o mates to review it for free.

Posted by: Richard Parker | January 4, 2008 11:11 PM

2

Cool!

Posted by: Laelaps | January 4, 2008 11:12 PM

3

Back in 2006, some frustrated Wikipedians and I were going to start "The People's Encyclopedia of Math and Physics".

Posted by: Blake Stacey | January 4, 2008 11:48 PM

4

Thank God you didn't do it. You can't spell maths or encyclopaedia properly!

And I'm not sure 'The People' would take kindly to such an enterprise. If they can't tell the difference between liberty, freedom, democracy and the lack or losing of them, do you really think they've been encouraged or educated to have respect, or the desire to learn much about maths and physics?

What percentage is it of the American people who think the sun goes round the earth?

Posted by: Richard Parker | January 5, 2008 12:17 AM

5

I'd be curious to know what paleontologists think of this journal. I'm familiar with the publisher's "Open Mathematics Journal" and think it is complete garbage. A vast editorial board, of whom I only recognized one name. Policies that are radically different from any other math journal I've ever seen (such as a preference for Word format). "Publication fees" that are totally out of the norm in mathematics. As far as I can tell, no actual published articles although they have been spamming me about the journal for some time. As an extra tacky touch, they proudly mention "Indexed in Google, Google Scholar" as if this were a mark of distinction; it makes me suspect that they are not indexed by the mathematics review journals (Math Reviews or Zentralblatt) although I haven't worked up the energy to check.

As far as I can tell, Bentham is mass producing Open X Journals for all fields X. What I'd like to know is whether they are all junk (as I suspect) or if sometimes they actually get a good editor in chief who manages to create a real journal. Perhaps in a field that is used to "publication fees"...

Posted by: Anonymous | January 5, 2008 3:18 AM

6

Anonymous - You've confirmed what I suspected, they're a fly-by-night attempt at being scientific vanity publishers.

All these shysters adopt 'respectable names' - think Franklin Mint, Linkin Park, Harper Adams University College, Roosevelt Hotel New York, etc.

If poor old Jeremy Bentham had a grave, he'd be turning in it.

Posted by: Richard Parker | January 5, 2008 9:06 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.