Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Cabinet of Curiosities #4 | Main | Carnivals »

Google Wants Photoshop To Run on Linux

Posted on: February 21, 2008 6:03 PM, by Greg Laden

And they are paying for it.


Google is funding work to ensure the Windows version of Adobe Systems' Photoshop and other Creative Suite software can run on Linux computers.

For the project, Google is funding programmers at CodeWeavers, a company whose open-source Wine software lets Windows software run on Linux. Wine is a compatibility layer that intercepts a program's Windows commands and converts them to instructions for the Linux kernel and its graphics subsystem.

Story here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/64714

Comments

1

Fantastic blog!

Posted by: Michael | February 21, 2008 6:30 PM

2

I just need to give people credit where it is due.
Codeweavers does not make Wine. Wine is an open source community project, and Codeweavers came along and used the GPLed code for their own software. They contribute development time to Wine (through their own software) but are in no way the creators or owners of Wine. That's like calling Redhat the owner/creator of GNU/Linux.

Posted by: Chaz | February 21, 2008 11:10 PM

3

Chaz: Right. The whole point of even posting this is to discuss it, and I'm so glad you came along and started it.

I think Codeweaver's relationship to the project is legal, etc., but it is not very common.
A couple/few years ago I experimented with Codeweaver and with Wine and I found that Codeweaver was easier to install and use (for a noobie) and orgainized things well, so I stongly recommend it for people who need to run, say, Y=1-or-2 age versions of Microsoft Office and Endnote. Just pay them the 25 bucks once, and by the time the license runs out you won't need them.

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 22, 2008 7:22 AM

4

Another comment on CodeWeavers and Wine.

First off CodeWeavers product is called CrossOver Office. What CodeWeavers did was focus on a limited set of applications and tune the areas of the binary emulator in Wine to work with those applications. As time has progressed they have added to the list of supported applications. In addition what they learn goes back into the main Wine development. There is/was a connection established as CodeWeavers hired many of the core Wine developers to work for them. (Not sure if this is still the case.)

My understanding that there have been other cases of CodeWeavers being contracted to make certain apps work with CrossOver. I think most of those were by the software vendor. This looks like a "user" sponsored contract.

Posted by: JackU | February 22, 2008 2:06 PM

5

I wonder what could have happened if Google had decided to fund the GIMP instead.

Posted by: Abie | March 8, 2008 3:40 AM

6

"I wonder what could have happened if Google had decided to fund the GIMP instead."

Then google would be out of money and The GIMP would still suck.

:)

Posted by: Steven R | March 8, 2008 11:19 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.