What if human consciousness isn't the end-all and be-all of Darwinism? What if we are all just pawns in corn's clever strategy game, the ultimate prize of which is world domination? Author Michael Pollan asks us to see things from a plant's-eye view -- to consider the possibility that nature isn't opposed to culture, that biochemistry rivals intellect as a survival tool. By merely shifting our perspective, he argues, we can heal the Earth. Who's the more sophisticated species now?
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- Jason Thibeault on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- Stephanie Z on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- Jason Thibeault on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- Dan J on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- mk on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- Jason Thibeault on Evolution vs. Creationism on Family Guy
- Jason Thibeault on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- Dan J on Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- The Science Pundit on Evolution vs. Creationism on Family Guy
- foolfodder on Evolution vs. Creationism on Family Guy
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
Archives
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- Linux: Schedule tasks
- Installing Linux in Under 5 minutes
- Qi Zhang's electrifying organ performance
- Evolution vs. Creationism on Family Guy
- Does your Windows have a bad virus? How to fix with Linux
- Reinstalling Grub
- An interview with death
- Who is freakier, Cats or Dogs?
- Bachmann on Census
- What I had for breakfast: Belief = Blame
« George Dyson: Let's take a nuclear-powered rocket to Saturn | Main | Blogrolling »
Michael Pollan: The omnivore's next dilemma
Category: Brain and Behavior
Posted on: February 15, 2008 8:17 PM, by Greg Laden
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/64256
Comments
I would argue there are a plethora of bacterial species that are more sophisticated than a lot of relatively inconsequential multi-cellular mammals.
Posted by: Lorax | February 15, 2008 8:33 PM
I am not sure that any single prokaryote should be considered more "sophisticated" than the complex amalgamations of complex cells that pass for most people's common perception of "animals". But in terms of numbers they have definitely done better than us. After all, in simple numbers, then the modern factory-fed chicken is probably the most successful bird in history. It's just a more sophisticated argument than Douglas Adams' suggestion that it's the lab mice who really control human development.
Posted by: R N B | February 16, 2008 11:35 AM
What do you mean by "What if human consciousness isn't the end-all and be-all of Darwinism? " Evolutionary theory has no end-all or be-all, although that is a popular misconception. Is that what you are addressing - the misconception (or as I have not yet viewed this talk, is that what the speaker is getting at) ?
Posted by: Badger3k | February 16, 2008 3:42 PM