Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin, Geologist

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Patents Patently Absurd: The End of Innovation in Education Will Come at the Hands of The Corporate Business Model | Main | Why is there a big huge pile of trucks in Secaucus, New Jersey? »

New-generation antidepressants do not produce clinically significant improvements in depression

Category: Brain and BehaviorHealth
Posted on: February 27, 2008 2:17 PM, by Greg Laden

In this open access publication in PLoS it is


...suggest that, compared with placebo, the new-generation antidepressants do not produce clinically significant improvements in depression in patients who initially have moderate or even very severe depression, but show significant effects only in the most severely depressed patients. The findings also show that the effect for these patients seems to be due to decreased responsiveness to placebo, rather than increased responsiveness to medication. Given these results, the researchers conclude that there is little reason to prescribe new-generation antidepressant medications to any but the most severely depressed patients unless alternative treatments have been ineffective. In addition, the finding that extremely depressed patients are less responsive to placebo than less severely depressed patients but have similar responses to antidepressants is a potentially important insight into how patients with depression respond to antidepressants and placebos that should be investigated further.


Here is the original article.
You don't need to be special to read it, since it is published in an Open Access journal.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/65220

Comments

1

The press coverage of this has been misleading, according to this pharmacy student (I found him via SciBlog's own Terra Sigillatta). http://secundumartem.blogspot.com/2008/02/some-depressing-news.html

Quickly -- the studies were not original studies, but meta examinations of previous studies. The previous studies only showed the effects of 4-6 months in mildly depressed patients. They don't cover severely depressed nor long term use.

Posted by: Kelly | February 29, 2008 11:26 AM

2

Yes, it is a meta study (which is still a study) and it focuses on a subset of treatments and conditions, as do all studies. I have not seen the press coverage, but I'm not surprised to find that it is misleading.

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 29, 2008 11:55 AM

3

As the director of Novus Medical Detox, I often see patients who are on alcohol or opioids, central nervous system depressants, also taking antidepressants. When they detox they find they don't need the antidepressants.

This is good news because a Swedish study showed that 52% of the 2006 suicides by women on antidepressants. Since antidepressants work no better than placebos and are less effective than exercise in dealing with depression.

There is a prescription drug epidemic and these are leaders in the list of terribe abuses.

Steve Hayes
http://novusdetox.com

Posted by: steve hayes | March 1, 2008 11:42 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.