A California appellate court agreed Wednesday to rehear arguments in a controversial case that called into question the legality of home schooling, court documents show.A statewide uproar began when a panel with the 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled in last month that there is no constitutional right to home school children.
The ruling arose following an investigation into abuse inside a Los Angeles family that home schooled its children.
The court agreed to rehear the case based on a request from the father in the family at the center of the case. The father, identified only as Philip L., is represented by Ramona-based attorney Gary Kreep.
Kreep is allied with the Alliance Defense Fund, which announced on its Web site Wednesday the court's decision to rehear the case. The Christian organization takes cases related to religious freedoms.
The court said it would look at two issues: whether there is a constitutional right to home school, and whether California law provides for instruction at home by parents who don't have teaching credentials and are not affiliated with any public school program.
The court also said it would consider arguments from the state superintendent of education, the State Board of Education and the California Teachers Association.
The matter will be argued in June.
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- JenW on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- MartinDH on Noachian Flood Reconstructed
- Karen Burke on w00t!!!! Rebecca and her book written up in Publishers Weekly
- katydid13 on Dear public school principals everywhere
- BdN on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- Greg Laden on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- Greg Laden on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- JGlenn on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- henry harpending on New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- A on You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- w00t!!!! Rebecca and her book written up in Publishers Weekly
- Has swine flu peaked, and it if has, what does that mean?
- New mouse for OpenOffice and other OpenSource apps
- How do you explain evolution?
- You said one thing wrong, therefore everything you ever said is also wrong
- Dear public school principals everywhere
- Managing your References
- Noachian Flood Reconstructed
- The Corporation Part 15
- Cobra vs. Python: Who would win?
« Neil Turok: 2008 TED Prize wish: An African Einstein | Main | Faith Vs. Speculation: Religious Instructor Resigns In Disagreement Over Reality of Jesus »
Home Schooling in California
Posted on: March 27, 2008 5:41 PM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in: 
Education & Careers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/67951
Comments
I hate to admit it but even I have to agree that is a perfect name for a lawyer.
Posted by: John Pieret | March 27, 2008 8:39 PM
From the federal point of law, tings are pretty vague and left up to the states except they are required to mandate and regulate some minimum standard of education. Currently, home schooling requirements are decided at the state level (see http://www.hslda.org/laws/). There appear to be no Federal mandates about how children are schooled at all. However the states are Federally mandated to provide a minimum quality of schooling for all children, and hence there are minimum (apparently minimal too) teacher accreditation requirements in order to be able to teach in a state run school. Private schools not so much. They are more constrained by reputation. Home not mentioned at the Federal level at all, except as it is covered by the minimal standards requirement.
So, basically, there is no Constitutional or Federal regulation that would override or dictate this decision. There is only the somewhat vague idea that all children deserve to be properly educated, whatever that means.
It did not take excessive Googling to find the relevant CA Compulsory Education law. Basically, if the parents are doing the teaching, they are required to hold CA teaching credentials for the appropriate grade. This is a long url but:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=48001-49000&file=48220-48232
This is a section from the comprehensive CA Education list:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=edc&codebody=&hits=20
which includes 2007 changes.
This answers the second point: "The court said it would look at two issues: whether there is a constitutional right to home school, and whether California law provides for instruction at home by parents who don't have teaching credentials and are not affiliated with any public school program." A: it does not.
I was led to this information from the CA Dept of Education web page, "Private Schools Frequently Asked Questions" section, question 11 "What is the compulsory education law?":
http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/ps/cd/psfaq.asp#psfaqs9
So either the parents were accredited or not. Apparently the mother failed to answer this question. The constitutionality question is moot since the requirements are left up to the states to define and enforce.
Seems quite unambiguous to me.
Posted by: Gray Gaffer | March 28, 2008 3:34 AM
I don't understand home-schooling in America. In the UK, all children are both entitled by law to an education until the age of 16, and required by law to attend appropriate schooling - and parents can be prosecuted for neglect if they fail to provide such a facility to their children (IANAL, etc, it's more likely to be "prevent their children from attending", or other such wording).
Presumably similar laws exists in America? If it considered a child's right to receive a sufficient standard of education, and it is a requirement that parent's ensure such schooling is made available to their children, then how can it be possible for parent's without sufficient teacher training to school their children? If the parent's are preventing their children from receiving an adequate standard of education - ie, if they are not sufficiently qualified to teach them - then how is that not at the very least willful neglect?
Posted by: Armchair Dissident | March 28, 2008 10:32 AM
Hey Armchair,
Do you have any evidence that formal teaching qualifications for parents are either necessary or sufficient to ensure proper education of home-schooled children?
Posted by: Theo Bromine | March 28, 2008 12:30 PM
I assume Arm will provide commentary related to the UK (who's children are by and large much better educated then the US at certain ages). For the US, Theo, your question is a bit of a red herring. The home schooling community by and large is very quick to insist that home schooling is terrific, but even quicker to insist that any kind of real reasearch or data collection to measure this form of education should not happen. (By and large ... the home schooling community is very diverse. But I have yet to encounter more than one or two people in that community who would ever assent to having a systematic study and evaluation done).
Posted by: Greg Laden | March 28, 2008 12:47 PM
Well, I'm neither in the UK nor the US, but in Canada, where we usually fall somewhere between UK and US custom and practice.
And I was one of those (apparently rare) homeschoolers who would have welcomed research, data collection and increased opportunities for my kids to demonstrate their proficiency against common standards. But I am still waiting for someone to explain what is the point of requiring formal teaching qualifications for homeschooling parents. Teaching qualifications are mainly about group pedagogy and classroom management. As an electrical engineer, I'm sure I could teach advanced math and physics to one or two high school kids, but jsut the thought of teaching addition and subtraction to 25 6-year-olds fills me with dread. On the other hand, my son's (public school) grade 5 science teacher did not know just how long light took to get from the sun to the earth (but was sure it was much longer than the 8 minutes my son was suggesting)
Posted by: Theo Bromine | March 29, 2008 1:39 AM