An investigation is underway into how a gun carried by a US Airways pilot was discharged during a flight.No-one was hurt when the gun went off as the plane was preparing to land at Charlotte, North Carolina, on Saturday.
A hole in a cockpit wall apparently caused by the shot is visible in photos obtained by AP news agency.
Under a programme implemented after the 9/11 attacks, US airline pilots are allowed to carry guns on domestic flights following a training course.
...
The gun discharged just before noon on Saturday aboard Flight 1536 from Denver to Charlotte, as the Airbus A319 plane was at about 8,000 feet and was approaching to land.
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- MadScientist on The Cost of College: California
- Phil on The Cost of College: California
- PeggyOh on Happy Birthday The Origin of Species!!!!
- Brian X on A new open source computer language. Go.
- Joseph Steinberg on Happy Birthday The Origin of Species!!!!
- dhogaza on "Climate Gate" ... the latest scandalous outrages
- Keith Harwood on The Free Market, Flu Vaccine and The Role of Gummit
- jafsica on Let the War on Christmas Begin. Atheist style.
- Danged Ol' Dave on CERN: "Atoms ... we smashes them"
- Lurker on An Interview with Jason Page, Film Maker, about White Man's World
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
I also blog at Quiche Moraine, where you will find interesting restaurant reviews, political trades, and tear jerking memories. Such as:
- - Strong Ideas and Exclusionary Thinking: Obama, Palin and Greek Food in Minneapolis
- - Midori’s Floating World Cafe
- - Dinner at Azia
- - The Black Forest Inn: Anarchists 2; Scientists 1
- - The Hurricane Lantern Effect
- - Maybe We Should Have Elected a White President After All
- - The Day the Right Wing Lost Its Last Shred of Moral Standing
- - My Journey Through Race and Racism (Part I)
- - Fashion at the West Bank’s Bedlam
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- Happy Birthday The Origin of Species!!!!
- CERN: "Atoms ... we smashes them"
- Top Ten Internet Videos Countdown: #8
- Global Warming Gate Beginning to Cool Down
- We were warned....
- The Cost of College: California
- Increasing Diversity among the college ranks
- "Climate Gate" ... the latest scandalous outrages
- An Interview with Jason Page, Film Maker, about White Man's World
- Crocodile ancestors found in Sahara
« Saving Science from Creationists and Framers: In support of a diligent, relentless critique | Main | Learning the bash shell, third look »
Ooops ... gun goes off on commercial plane
Category: Gun Ownership
Posted on: March 26, 2008 2:45 PM, by Greg Laden
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/67816
Comments
Guns on airplanes. What could possibly go wrong? In the AP story a TSA spokesman called it a "very safe" handgun, a statement only an American would make.
Posted by: andythebrit | March 26, 2008 3:44 PM
They should still require that they use ceramic or rubber bullets. No one should be able to carry a weapon capable of piercing through a plane (metal or glass) onto a plane. No matter how dangerous the skies may be, there's no reason to have a weapon that dangerous up there. Ceramic bullets shatter when they impact something harder than flesh. Rubber bullets would just cause a lot of pain and a large bruise to whoever they hit... and neither could go through a plane and risk cabin decompression.
What about tazers and stun guns?
There are certainly a great many alternatives to an actual firearm on a plane that could be equally protective in such a small space.
Posted by: Nathaniel | March 26, 2008 5:04 PM
Fifty years ago, there were lots of guns on planes, and never a problem. Many passengers carried concealed handguns. Hunters could bring their cherished rifles and shotguns aboard with them. Practically every male passenger had a pocket knife, and many had sheath knives. And no problems.
Then JFK got shot and the rules changed. DB Cooper showed the world how to hijack airliners full of newly unarmed passengers. The 2001 Faith Based Initiative on September 11 showed the world how to hijack airliners without guns.
The older I get, the crazier the rest of you look.
Posted by: Snarly Old Fart | March 26, 2008 5:59 PM
I like the idea of rubber or ceramic bullets. Good suggestion.
If a hijacker or terrorist has a gun what are you going to do if you have a gun anyway? Are you really going to shoot him? I've never tried to shoot another living thing, but I don't think it would be an easy thing. (I enjoyed shooting at paper targets at summer camp decades ago.) A shoot out on a plane full of people doesn't sound like it would be a very safe thing.
The pilot has a much better chance to just dive the plane and bring it up in a roller coaster fashion. Not much a terrorist is going to do to get to the cockpit under those conditions. Will innocent people get hurt? Yes. Would it be more than if there was as shoot out ont he plane? I don't know.
Posted by: jim | March 26, 2008 6:18 PM
Just two words: armored doors. If terrorists can't shoot the pilots nor get to the cockpit, hijacking is slightly more complicated.
Besides, it is now quite a lot more complicated to use hijacked planes as missiles as people know what to expect. That it succeeded once, doesn't mean it can be repeated. The group on the Pennsylvania plane failed because people knew (if the plane was shot down, they most likely would have failed anyway).
A plane full of guns is sheer insanity and is itself a much greater risk than hijacking.
Posted by: Dunkleosteus | March 26, 2008 6:40 PM