Dawkins Admits to Not Being Perfect Atheist: Consideres Possibility that Fairies and Green Unicorns May, just May Exist. (But almost certainly not.)
Hat tip: Science and Religion News
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
If you like this post, please consider submitting it to openlab 2008.
Recent Comments
- clinteas on One New Snow Poll: No to Creationism!
- clinteas on McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.*
- AJ on Florida Teacher = Racist Pig
- DK on Review of SMM Exhibit on Race and Racism
- wrpd on McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.*
- T. Hunt on McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.*
- Stephanie Z on McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.*
- wrpd on One New Snow Poll: No to Creationism!
- Alan Kellogg on McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.*
- Greg Laden on One New Snow Poll: No to Creationism!
Search this blog
Recent Posts
- Palin: Unethical Power Abuser
- One New Snow Poll: No to Creationism!
- McCain PWNED by Minnesota. Race Over.*
- YA Virgin Birth
- Expelled (The Movie) Out of Hot Water from Ono Law Suit
- Ubuntu Family Theater
- Linux Security How To
- How bad is the current stock market crash?
- Turmoil
- Latest Polls
Rotating Blogroll
Archives
« PC vs. Mac: Games | Main | Technology News »
Dawkins on Maher
Category: Creation Science • Creationism • Intelligent Design • Religion • Science
Posted on: April 13, 2008 3:38 PM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in: 
Life Science
Comments
Heretic! Everyone knows (and Dawkins even said himself) that the unicorns that almost surely do not exist are *pink*
Posted by: Theo Bromine | April 13, 2008 4:17 PM
there was a note next to the bed where I spent the night...it said "Only the Devil would be a 7 on the Dawkins scale."
Then I had a real weird dream about the name on my tombstone being spelled worng...
Posted by: the real cmf | April 13, 2008 5:01 PM
"The brilliant Cerebron, attacking the problem analytically, discovered three distinct kinds of dragon: the mythical, the chimerical, and the purely hypothetical. They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each nonexisted in an entirely different way ..."
Posted by: Roman Werpachowski | April 13, 2008 6:30 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=VFfbR_BWsuU
This is from the new rules on the same episode. Hilarious!
Posted by: Gordon S | April 13, 2008 8:44 PM
Dawkins is so arrogant...
Posted by: Noah Z. | April 13, 2008 9:01 PM
Hilarious!
Posted by: Anne | April 14, 2008 12:02 PM