Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo

The Skeptical Search Engine

This search engine will only give you results from carefully selected skeptical and scientific sites.



Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« The Boneyard XIII | Main | Hedgehog as a weapon »

Louisiana Academic Freedom Act

Posted on: April 7, 2008 9:39 AM, by Greg Laden

Louisiana now has an Academic Freedom Act in the works. Academic Freedom Acts are right wing ploys to force specific issues ... or more commonly, specific politically or religiously motivated version of issues ... into the classroom at various levels. Academic Freedom Acts also typically are designed to silence faculty who teach things that conservatives, evangelicals, global warming deniers, and so on do not want to hear.

From a commentary in The Daily Advertiser:


Gov. Bobby Jindal's first regular-session legislative plan is designed to help Louisiana schools train a better work-force. So why does Sen. Ben Nevers seem hell-bent on taking our schools back to the Dark Ages?

Nevers, D-Bogalusa, has introduced the Louisiana Academic Freedom Act. (See also Patriot Act, Freedom to Farm Act.) The legislation's innocent-sounding purpose is to prohibit anyone who runs a public elementary or secondary school from preventing the teaching of "certain scientific evidence." It forbids "content-based censorship."

Innocent, that is, until you stumble across Paragraph 4(a), which outlines the "certain scientific evidence." That would be, among other things, intelligent design.
There's nothing stupid about believing that God created everything - at least not to me, since that's what I believe. But intelligent design is an affront to both religion and science. And, in a way, it got its start here.


Read the rest of the commentary, buy Bill Decker, here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Education & CareersPolitics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/68867

Comments

2

Casey Luskin comments, and I blog about it. Note my frustration as I try to explain what is wrong with it to one of my friends.

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | April 7, 2008 7:39 PM

3

Will they never realize that the unavoidable use of words like "evidence", "scientific", and "content-based" in such legislation leads inevitably to crushing court losses when a teacher or district tries to inject nonevidential, unscientific, content-free bronze-age myths into the classroom?

Posted by: Jason Failes | April 7, 2008 9:05 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.