Now on ScienceBlogs: The Ultimate Charles Darwin Coffee-Table Book

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

Archives

Recent Posts

« It is OK to be an atheist, but not an uppity atheist | Main | Atheist Dad, Catholic Mom, and the Kentucky Constitution »

Whence "Blue Blood?"

Category: Anthropology
Posted on: April 6, 2008 6:04 PM, by Greg Laden

A "Blue Blood" is an upper classer, or one with new money, or nobility, or something along those lines (the use of the term varies, as is the case with almost all terms in any language, of course). The meaning of the term came up in discussion of actual blue (or not) blood, here. Well, I looked it up on Wikipedia and following is an edited down summary of the possible truth of the matter of "Blue Blood."

Blue blood is an English expression recorded since 1834 for noble birth or descent; it is a translation of the Spanish phrase sangre azul, which described the Spanish royal family and other high nobility who claimed to be 'pure', free of Moorish or Jewish blood, being of Visigothic descent. There is no connection between the phrase and the actual blood color of nobility; however, in the ancient agricultural societies of Europe the whole upper class had superficial veins that might be more visible and appear bluish by comparison to the rest of the pale-pinkish skin, as the skin itself was not tanned.... [which feels like something added to an otherwise nice piece of wiki-work ... ] An alternative traditional explanation, argyria (a disease causing a blue-grey skin tone after digestion of silver), is considered less valid, as table silverware was not regularly used by much of the nobility. [and, I might add, does not happen today among those who use silver all the time...]

Robert Lacey explains the genesis of the blue blood concept: "It was the Spaniards who gave the world the notion that an aristocrat's blood is not red but blue. The Spanish nobility started taking shape around the ninth century in classic military fashion, occupying land as warriors on horseback. They were to continue the process for more than five hundred years, clawing back sections of the peninsula from its Moorish occupiers, and a nobleman demonstrated his pedigree by holding up his sword arm to display the filigree of blue-blooded veins beneath his pale skin--proof that his birth had not been contaminated by the dark-skinned enemy. (Robert Lacey, Aristocrats. Little, Brown and Company, 1983, p. 67) [this, I will run down ... nice implementation of the race concept by those Spanish guys....] ...

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/68784

Comments

1

In all my Spanish history courses, never did the blue blood thing come up. So that's an interesting little factoid to add to the repertoire. Thanks :)

Posted by: Natalie Wagner | April 6, 2008 6:54 PM

2

In reference to "new money" I am under the impression that the "Nouveau Riche" were not accepted by the nobility just because they had money; they were looked down upon as the rest of us hoi polloi whose ancestry was not "clear."

The explanation in the Wiki article you have adapted makes sense.

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | April 6, 2008 7:10 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM