Now on ScienceBlogs: An Experiment in Teaching Writing: A Look Inside the Sausage Factory

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Impacts of anthropogenic climate change many, varied | Main | Science News »

Conservatives: What you really really want is to make the gay people get married. Now.

Category: GLBTAJimmy James Bettencourt
Posted on: May 19, 2008 8:33 AM, by Greg Laden

A guest editorial post on gay marriage by Jimmy James Bettencourt.


image
Portia de Rossi and Ellen DeGeneres are to be married in California. This will ensure the protection of their children and their creditors.

I do not understand why gay marriage is not a conservative issue.

Gay people have been getting away with all kinds of shit for too long and it is time to stop. Straight people are getting screwed and if the government is going to do something useful, they should act now in every state ... and nationally ... and not just in California and Massachusetts.

Gay people already have several built in advantages in life over straight people. The very fact that they do not have to spend time and energy negotiating with members of the opposite sex in relation to personal matters such as sexual liasons or household division of labor gives them time to expend energy on other things such as running businesses, getting educated, and supporting political causes. Thus, in all the ways we expect people to behave in this free-market democracy, gay people have a significant advantage. And I for one am tired of it.

Everybody knows that the "old boy's club" is the way to go if you want to get things organized. But the gay version of this ... and there is more than one possible version ... is clearly much more organized and powerful. I suppose this is because gay people are, once again, less distracted by the difficulties of being straight. This is probably why quasi-gay organizations like Bohemian Grove and the Tri-Lateral Commission have pretty much taken over the worlds of finance and arms trafficking. respectively.

But all this aside, consider the issue of legally required gay non-marriage.

Marriage is a global phenomenon ... all cultures have marriage. But it varies a lot from culture to culture. So let's focus on western marriage. Western marriage is a tradition that started thousands of years ago. We have glimpses of this tradition in writings of the Babylonians, Sumerian's, and in the Old Testament, for instance. (Let us ignore those crazy Egyptians for the time being.) It is abundantly clear that the main purpose of marriage is to protect collateral interests. Marriage is a social and legal mechanism to protect everybody else from the "happy couple." In other words, when two people get unofficially married, this has a number of effects on others ... in relation to property, probate, and business interests. The institution of marriage was clearly (and I am not making this up) developed primarily to protect those individuals (the government and its tax agencies, members of immediate and extended family, and the business community) from the kinds of shenanigans that can result when this little thing called love goes awry.

The ancients clearly understood that hell hath no fury like a man or woman scorned in the universe of love. Rationality is damned. Sensibility is not secured. And thus, the earliest prohibitions and regulations regarding marriage had to do with probate and community property, and indirectly, taxes.

I don't know how or when gay people did this. But somehow they have tricked the conservative establishment to be "against" them. Imagine finding a way to take all the people that you probably wouldn't like if you met them and make them want to stay away from you? On top of this, and this is the most important point, gay people have tricked the conservative establishment, somehow (...and this could only have happened if either gay people are extra smart or conservative people are extra dumb, or both...) to insist that gay couples could NOT be married. And thus, gay people are exempt from the laws that protect all people, gay and straight and in between, from the effects of love gone bad.

This is like all the people who like to fish convincing the establishment that "all fisher-people do not deserve to pay for permits or licenses." Do you see what I am saying?

The simple truth is that a ban on gay marriage is exactly what gay people were hoping for. It is time to unban gay marriage.




Jimmy James Bettencourt is a political commentator who has been in hiding since a minor tiff with an unnamed federal security agency about 20 years ago. This is his first column since that time. Bettencourt lives in an undisclosed location and communicates with the outside world exclusively with the use of a squadron of well trained homing pigeons.


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/72239

Comments

1

The homing pigeon union called. They want their members to be used for something relevant

Posted by: TomJoe | May 19, 2008 9:50 AM

2

Welcome to science blogs, Jimmy!

Posted by: Elizabeth | May 19, 2008 7:14 PM

3

Revealing the secrets of the Gay Mafia could be unhealthy. I hear they're everywhere.

Posted by: uncle noel | May 20, 2008 1:15 PM

4

I agree. Reign in these libertarian wanabees!

Posted by: Andrew | May 20, 2008 8:22 PM

5

And thus, the earliest prohibitions and regulations regarding marriage had to do with probate and community property, and indirectly, taxes.

So, you are saying that one of the earliest professions was lawmaking.

Posted by: Martin | May 23, 2008 7:53 AM

6

This is like all the people who like to fish convincing the establishment that "all fisher-people do not deserve to pay for permits or licenses." Do you see what I am saying?

Actually, you kind of lost me....

Posted by: Andrew | May 23, 2008 10:03 AM

7

i think gay ppl should get married if they r really truely happy

Posted by: lil momma | February 15, 2011 10:46 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.