Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Marilyn Monroe Found Dead .... | Main | Goats are still useful »

First Cloned Pets

Category: Other
Posted on: August 5, 2008 9:09 AM, by Greg Laden

South Korean Scientists (so, this may be entirely made up) claim to have cloned a pet dog for the first time. This was paid for by Bernann McKinney, of California, clearly a person with too much money on her hands, who paid $50,000 for five copies of his bet Booger.

"Booger was my partner and my friend," Ms McKinney said, as she appeared with the five identical copies of her pet.

Scientists at Seoul National University created a number of embryos from preserved skin cells taken from Booger's ear tissue before he died.

The embryos were then implanted into two surrogate mother dogs and, three months later, the puppies were born.

Among the scientists involved in the project was Professor Lee Byeong-chun, who was part of the team that created the world's first cloned dog - Snuppy the Afghan hound - in 2005. *

Right. Sure.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/78169

Comments

1

Uh, identical? I don't think so. Like the cloned kitten, cloned puppies should have their own distinctive patterning. Of course, that could just be sloppy reporting.

Posted by: Stephanie Z | August 5, 2008 10:07 AM

2

Source, please?

Posted by: Deathweasel | August 5, 2008 4:10 PM

3

It depends. If the dog is a variegated breed, the patterns should be different, but if they're one solid colour, they should all look the same.

Posted by: wazza | August 6, 2008 2:02 AM

4

I'm inclined to agree with David Quammen:

The delivery price of [a cloned cat]... is $50,000. On the other hand, $50,000 buys a lot of pretty good cats.

Dear Birdbrain McGooney:

May I suggest a better way of spending that $50k? Give $49k of it to your local no-kill animal shelter and adopt your next pet there. Or better yet, split that money between the shelter and a nonprofit agency that provides helper animals for people with disabilities.

The result? Lots of happy animals, lots of happy people, and far fewer cranky old farts like me wishing we could ream you a new one for being such a selfish jerk.

=^..^=

Posted by: themadlolscientist, FCD | August 6, 2008 11:33 PM

5
This was paid for by Bernann McKinney, of California, clearly a person with too much money on her hands, who paid $50,000 for five copies of his bet Booger.
(Emphasis added by me)
Did the $50,000 cover the mid-sentence sex change too?
PS, you misspelled 'pet' 'bet'.

Posted by: llewelly | August 7, 2008 12:21 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.