Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Blogospherics: Recommended reads | Main | I'll see you at the debates, bitches.... »

Paul is dead Paul is dead Paul is dead

Category: Other
Posted on: August 5, 2008 11:03 PM, by Greg Laden

This is Michael Shermer

Wow, that was cool. Now since you are in the mood, check this out if you have not already seen it:

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/78236

Comments

1

I buried Greg I buried Greg

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | August 6, 2008 12:44 AM

2

http://www.evtv1.com/player.aspx?itemnum=4934&aid=19

Fantastic impression of Cocker by John Belushi.

Posted by: Hume's Ghost | August 6, 2008 2:59 AM

3

Oh, great, Laden. It's the wee hours, I desperately need to call it a night, but I stop in here for a wee science nightcap. Instead I end up laughing myself sick over Joe Cocker, and now I don't dare sneak into bed because visions of Joe will dance in my head, eliciting stifled snickers and muffled cackles that will surely disturb my dear hubby. (He'll probably forgive me after seeing the video, though.)

Posted by: Sheri | August 6, 2008 5:27 AM

4

You might like to check out my post here - where I have summarised some of the issues I have had with Shermer's presentation (very much akin to the one that Dr Richard Wiseman presented at TAM3):

http://podblack.com/?p=202 - 'Going Backwards'

When teaching students, they sometimes missed the point that was being made. I find my collection gets it across a little better... ;)

Posted by: Podblack | August 6, 2008 7:24 AM

5

That clears up a lot.
"A Spring clean for the May Queen" - all these years I thought it was "A sprinkling for the May Queen."


Wrapped up like a douche

Posted by: Virgil Samms | August 6, 2008 9:13 AM

6

I always thought it was "A sprinkling" too and I've been listening to Led for over 40 years...

Posted by: Joel | August 6, 2008 9:21 AM

7

I'll never believe my lying ears again.

Posted by: sailor | August 6, 2008 9:57 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.