Now on ScienceBlogs: Live Organ Transplants

Seed Media Group

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Blogroll

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
openlab08-submit.150.png



open_access_day_blog_award.jpg

Archives

Recent Posts

« The results are in. Obama clearly won the debate. | Main | America's Top Model Reveals All ... and other matters »

How the LHC works

Category: LHC
Posted on: September 27, 2008 3:32 PM, by Greg Laden

(BTW: It does not "straddle both France and Switzerland" ... it straddles the border.)


Totally stolen from ABATC

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/82207

Comments

1

Ah, I should have known it also exists on YouTube - brb, gotta embed now!

Posted by: Coturnix | September 27, 2008 4:39 PM

2

Very cool! I have a question - nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Here we have two streams going head to head at nearly the speed of light. So their relative velocity will be nearly twice the speed of light. Does that create any problems?

Posted by: sailor | September 27, 2008 4:43 PM

3

sailor, no, no problem. their relative velocity (the speed of one of them as measured by the other one) is still slightly less than the speed of light, thanks to relativity.

Posted by: Nomen Nescio | September 27, 2008 7:14 PM

4

Nothing can exceed the speed of light in a vacuum. It is possible to force particles to exceed the speed of light in other mediums such as air or water (resulting in an extremely cool phenomenon known as Cerenkov radiation). Two beams traveling at near-light speed would only approximate the speed of light in a vacuum, never exceed it.

Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | September 27, 2008 7:15 PM

5

Sailor: I'm sorry to say that my learnerd commenters here are missing the point of your question.

According to the Theory of Relativity standing at the time that Einstein started thinking about this (no this theory, but the original theory) the closing speed of two protons each going, say, 200 million meters a second would be ... relative to either one ... 400 million meters a second. That was an obvious fact. However, it was also just recently known at the time that every single time you measure light it is going at the same speed (in the measurement modalities of the day).

Einstein's SPECIAL theory of relativity reconciles these two facts by assuming that both are true with respect everything but time. Well, initially. Once you do this, a LOT of other things suddenly either fall neatly into place or get very very spooky.


Posted by: greg laden | September 27, 2008 7:21 PM

6

Einstein didn't believe in spooky. He got around the whole notion of velocity addition by representing space-time as non-Euclidean. Hyperbolic geometry is meant to reconcile the conflicts since the particles would be traveling asymptotically.

Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | September 27, 2008 7:31 PM

7

Yea, and that gets pretty spooky. I mean, we are used to the concept of "spacetime".

Posted by: greg laden | September 27, 2008 7:47 PM

8

Thank you all for the comments. I am not sure I am wiser as I thought speed was a function of time. I am still not also sure how two things going in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light relative to their surroundings could also be going the same speed relative to each other. Something odd would have to happen to time, which maybe is what Greg was saying.

Posted by: sailor | September 28, 2008 8:35 AM

9

The way this works out is that the time itself is different for each proton. The protons are literally experiencing different time than an observer watching from, say, Geneva.

Posted by: Greg Laden | September 28, 2008 8:52 AM

10

OK got it.

Posted by: sailor | September 28, 2008 12:00 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM