This is fake, right?
Hell bent, Charlie. Don't you get it? Hell. Bent.
Let's analyze this a little more closely.....
Now on ScienceBlogs: Must Read
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.
Looking for stuff about birds?
Lean more about lions
An archaeological expedition to the Congo
The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.
Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.
« Killing a process gently | Main | Hey, can I still get that $50 / hour for picking lettuce? »
Category: Politics
Posted on: September 25, 2008 10:40 PM, by Greg Laden
This is fake, right?
Hell bent, Charlie. Don't you get it? Hell. Bent.
Let's analyze this a little more closely.....
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/82108
denialism blog 02.14.2012
respectful insolence 02.14.2012
uncertain principles 02.13.2012
confessions of a science librarian 02.13.2012
starts with a bang! 02.13.2012
Comments
He should have kept at her, demanding a yes or a no. Either she gives one, committing to Bush or opposing him, or the interview runs out of time and she looks like a liar trying to cover her tracks -- which is what she is.
Posted by: Nattering Nabob of Negativism | September 26, 2008 8:10 AM
'I can see dinosaurs from my back porch'
Palin-tology and the threat to science teaching
Posted by: Virgil Samms | September 26, 2008 9:35 AM
He did keep after her, demanding a yes or no answer to whether she believed the US has the unilateral right to invade a country. She kept blathering on about "Islamic terrorists". And she never did answer his question. Instead, she blathered more canned-souning answers from relatively typical right-wing boilerplate. Ugh.
Anne G
Posted by: Anne Gilbert | September 26, 2008 5:52 PM