
http://www.2012draftsarahcommittee.com/
Click on "straw poll" in the sidebar.
Now on ScienceBlogs: Help Others, Help Ethan Shave his Head! [Neurotopia]
More ScienceBlogs: Last 24 Hours • Life Science • Physical Science • Environment • Humanities • Education • Politics • Medicine • Brain & Behavior • Technology • Information Science • Jobs
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
« Recount: Franken Moves Closer | Main | Lame Duck Bush Administration Plans To Gut Endangered Species »
Category: Politics
Posted on: November 20, 2008 10:01 AM, by Greg Laden
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/86176
PZ Myers 07.19.2009
PZ Myers 07.18.2009
Ed Brayton 07.19.2009
Isis the Scientist 07.19.2009
ERV 07.18.2009
Latest science stories | More at nytimes.com![]()
3:28 AM, 07.18.2009
3:29 AM, 07.18.2009
2:06 AM, 07.19.2009
3:08 AM, 07.19.2009
1:06 PM, 07.17.2009
Comments
we need to get this up over on PZ's site.
Of course, if they're using Diebold it won't make any difference, but right now the loonies are in the lead...
Posted by: kate | November 20, 2008 10:52 AM
Uh, I'd *rather* have a Palin-Obama match-up in 012 as it would be way more entertaining and less worrisome than a real contest.
Posted by: Matthew Platte | November 20, 2008 11:01 AM
It's gone from 85-15 Palin to 55-45 Obama :D
Thanks for posting Greg!
Posted by: Tophe | November 20, 2008 11:37 AM
Oh but I'm torn. Palin running in '012 would be... oh man, I can't even describe how great.
Posted by: kevin | November 20, 2008 11:51 AM
I hope she doesn't get the republican nomination, but runs anyway. Sarah Palin - the Evangelical Ralph Nader.
Posted by: Jackal | November 20, 2008 12:04 PM
I wanted to vote for Sarah just to mess with them, but it was a straightforward question so I had to be honest about it. Damn liberal ethics!
Wish they'd asked; "Who would you like to see on the Republican ticket in '12?"
Posted by: george.wiman | November 20, 2008 12:05 PM
61- 39 Good Guys at this point in time.
Who in the F^7K are the 39% that voted for the Moose Maroon????
Posted by: J-Dog | November 20, 2008 12:08 PM
I gotta say, that's one of the sillier polls I've seen for bombing. But then, the idiotic hubris of running a candidate BEFORE the incumbent has even taken office is probably worth the ridicule.
Posted by: Brian X | November 20, 2008 12:42 PM
It doesn't specify what each person will win. I'm going to pretend that the competition is for the dumbest remark of the year, and vote for Palin.
Posted by: foolfodder | November 20, 2008 1:47 PM