Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo

The Skeptical Search Engine

This search engine will only give you results from carefully selected skeptical and scientific sites.



Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Atheists Talk radio Sunday | Main | Blogospherics: Recommended reads »

Conservatives: Republican Party Not Conservative Enough

Posted on: November 15, 2008 3:20 PM, by Greg Laden

From Amanda Carpenter

... conservative leaders convened for a meeting of the minds to plot a way to reinvigorate the Republican brand ...

Bozell saw the 2008 election as a decision between a "moderate" and a "far-left" candidate. The moderate lost. Therefore, "the moderate wing of the Republican Party is dead, it is finished," Bozell said.

...

Bozell pushed [for] "whole new generation of organizations, particularly on the grassroots level" and "massively increasing the fundraising."

Others demanded that conservatives, rather than moderate Republicans, be appointed to fill leading roles on Capitol Hill.

"Conservative are unhappy, upset even angry with national Republican leaders,"..

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/85782

Comments

1

Off to... roaming for 40 years in the desert...they'll have quite a legend to tell their kids one day in the far future.

Posted by: Coturnix | November 15, 2008 3:40 PM

2

Now that's kind of scary. I would be happy for them to squeeze into a far-right corner, if only I were sure that that would make them unelectable. Otherwise we could have the brute squads coming around to arrest the 40% of women who have had abortions.

Posted by: Monado in Toronto | November 15, 2008 3:40 PM

3

Well, you know what they say: "When you realize you're in a hole, the first thing to do is toss the shovel aside and start 'digging' with dynamite."

Posted by: Azkyroth | November 15, 2008 4:35 PM

4

"Ye have strayed from the path of righteousness, and thus the Lord punishes God's Own Party for its sin of tolerance! Repent and turn back to the strict ways of true Conservatism, and we shall prosper once more!"

I wonder to what extent the mindset of this traditional religious response to adversity is the cause, here. The religious see a pattern, and react in the way which their worldview dictates will yield a favorable result. I'd be tempted to encourage this, except that grade of whackaloon is focused in the part of the country where starting civil wars is a tradition.

Perhaps we should just try to use this to encourage bipartisan backing for road repair efforts?

Posted by: abb3w | November 15, 2008 10:35 PM

5

Well the Repubs have truly lost their way since selling out to the religious right. They hava abandoned small government, they have abandoned conservative economics, and abondoned personal freedom.

In the last election I was able to vote for an interesting independent: small government, pro freedom, anti-war fiscal conservative for Congress.

Posted by: jayh | November 16, 2008 8:10 AM

6

Having lost sight of their original goal, restrained but effective governance, they redouble their efforts.

When the Muslims started losing and were ultimately thrown back from Europe they became more fundamentalist. This is a fair depiction how Wahhabi got their foot in the door. This sort of reflexive response is historically accurate for almost all religions, political movements and established structures. So it goes with most every group struggling in ideological conflicts.

Pretty hard to find exceptions.

It is 'bigger hammer' logic. Insufficient use of force, a lack of dedication and contaminated ideological purity in the organization are always the first things to be blamed for any failure. The goals, motivations and methods are seldom questioned until the point of absolute exhaustion is reached.

So it goes.

Posted by: Art | November 16, 2008 3:26 PM

7

I do wonder what will happen if the Republicans continue on their rightward move. Will moderate Republicans break off into a third party (which will come to replace the Republicans in the dominant 2-party paradigm)? Or will the Republicans die out all together, leaving only the Democrats? Of course, if that happens, then most likely either a split between the liberal and conservative branches of the Democratic Party would occur, or a new party would arise to fill the center-right void (or perhaps that new party would arise even before the Republicans disappear all together)

Posted by: Paper Hand | November 16, 2008 6:04 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.