Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Linus Torvalds once found a segmentation fault in the universe | Main | Space Tool Bag Visible from Earth! »

Franken To Win Recount

Posted on: November 23, 2008 8:21 PM, by Greg Laden

FiveThirtyEight is a pretty good web site dealing with polls and other election realted number crunching. They predicted the outcome of the race for president almost as accurately as I did, so I figure they're pretty good. And now, FiveThirtyEight has a reasonably good analysis suggesting that Franken is going to win the recount.

Here's the argument in a nutshell. Franken is going to win because of all the reasons we've been saying all along (see this and this). But in some precincts, the Republicans are challenging a LOT of votes that are likely to be called as Franken votes, so they are NOT part of the current recount numbers that are coming out (see this). This effect ... Republicans burying Franken votes in the challenge pile .. may in fact be increasing.

So, the vote is likely to be close but still favoring Coleman until the special board that will review the challenges is done with its work. Then the vote will switch over to Franken. And Coleman will be out.

FiveThirtyEight's analysis is here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/86380

Comments

1

It's still too much of a coin flip for me, but I'll stay hopeful that Franken ekes out a victory.

Posted by: Zeno | November 23, 2008 8:49 PM

2

It's one thing to be called "the stupid party." It's quite another to internalize it.

Have any of these Einsteins considered the consequence of establishing a blanket rejection of ballots with mismatched Presidential and Senatorial markings?

Remind me again of how the State's Presidential vote turned out.

Posted by: D. C. Sessions | November 23, 2008 8:54 PM

3

Right. This state went overwhelmingly for Obama.

Posted by: Greg Laden | November 23, 2008 9:14 PM

4

"until the special board that will review the challenges is done with its work"

And the special board is made up of folks who all voted for Dean Barkley?

Posted by: Moopheus | November 23, 2008 10:23 PM

5

The board consists of two Supreme Court justices, two district court judges, and Secretary of State Mark Ritchie. Everyone involved is pretty happy with the makeup of the board. The contested ballots themselves are part of the public record.

Posted by: Greg Laden | November 24, 2008 7:23 AM

6

I shall commence with such the happy dance when Coleman is paraded out of Washington. Now, can we please work on a plan to get Pawlenty out of here?

Posted by: Bjorn Watland | November 24, 2008 8:43 AM

7

Despite the intellectual mathematical rigor that 538 shows, I don't buy that a Franken victory is in the cards.

I do think that post-recount, post-challenges, it will be extremely close.and no matter who "wins", there will be court challenges. I think the net of all of this will just tilt Coleman's way.

I can hope, but hope is not necessarily a plan. :)

Posted by: Paul | November 24, 2008 4:07 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.