Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Don't Ask Don't Tell: Don't Hold Your Breath | Main | Ingushetia Civil War Heats Up »

Man Cuddles Panda, Panda Mauls Man

Category: Darwin Awards
Posted on: November 22, 2008 10:52 PM, by Greg Laden

A man has been attacked by a panda at a park in southern China, after he climbed into its enclosure hoping to cuddle the creature.

The 20-year-old student had ignored warning signs and scaled a two-metre (6.5ft) barrier to get into the pen.

State media say the panda bit him on his arms and legs, and he had to be rescued by the animal's keepers.

Speaking from his hospital bed, the injured man said the panda had looked so cute he had just wanted to hug it.

bbc

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/86332

Comments

1

No means no, even if you're a panda.

Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | November 22, 2008 11:19 PM

2

And Brent Sienna gets a sense of schadenfreude.

Posted by: Benjamin Geiger | November 23, 2008 1:19 AM

3

It must have been the sexual harassment panda.

Posted by: Darek | November 23, 2008 2:06 AM

4

No means no, especially if you're a panda surely!

Posted by: mumfie | November 23, 2008 7:12 AM

5

So if he sees a young lady who looks very 'cuddleable,' would he force his attentions on her?

One of my pet peeves is this idea that cute and/or herbivore means harmless when it comes to animals. Our perception of cute is shaped throught relations with our children (seriously -- if babies were not percieved as cute by human moms, would the human race even exist?). Large eyes, small nose, oversized head, and short limbs trigger our 'cute' response.

The large eyes (well, they appear large because of the eye patches (shit, a pirate panda?)), oversized cheeks and forehead (which make the nose look smaller), relatively large head and short limbs of a panda have different evolutionary roots. Unfortunately, this asshat decided that if he percieves it as cute, cuddly, and harmless based on visual (mis)cues, it must be.

This guy was definately in the running for a Darwin Award.

Posted by: (((Billy))) The Atheist | November 23, 2008 7:59 AM

6

I never understood where the idea of herbivores being "harmless" came from. Carnivores know they can kill you, but won't try to do so unless hungry. Herbivores have the capacity of killing carnivores. However, the difference is that they don't kill because they are hungry. They kill if they see a threat they cannot immediately get away from. Trapped panda + perceived threat = recipe for disaster.

Posted by: MercurianFerret | November 23, 2008 10:22 AM

7

A 20-year-old man should know better. What an idiot.

Posted by: marilove | November 24, 2008 12:56 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.