Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Charles Elachi: The story of the Mars Rovers | Main | Peter Schiff vs. Ben Stein »

Minnesota Senate Recount: Numbers Settle In

Posted on: November 25, 2008 7:15 AM, by Greg Laden

The numbers are now settling in for the Coleman-Franken Senate race recount for Minnesota. With 74.2% of the votes counted, it is now possible to make a reasonably good prediction of the outcome of the current recount, not counting challenged ballots or other changes. The following graph shows the change across time for each day of the recount in the number of votes for each of these two candidates.

Coleman-Franken-Recount.jpg

What you see here is a random scatter of points. The regression line has become meaningless. What this tells us is that the number of votes from the recount process will be about 45 less for Coleman than at the start. In other words, the distance between Coleman and Franken at the end of this first phase will be about 170.

In the mean time, each side has challenged almost exactly 1,400 ballots. Hidden away in these 1,400 ballots. I estimate that about 1000 ballots in each camp belong to the candidate who did not challenge the ballot. The remaining ballots ... between 300 and 400 ... are ballots that were in the "other" pile but are now being considered as votes for one candidate or another. It is those ballots that will determine who wins this race.

Wednesday will be a big day. On Wednesday, the State Canvassing Board may decide on inclusion (or no) of a number of absentee ballots that were excluded from the original election. The Franken camp is asking that ballots wrongfully excluded be included. The canvassing board will also look into asking the parties involved to reduce the number of challenges that have been made, which mirrors a suggestion made earlier by Franken. This, however, is not too important. If it is easy for the two campaigns to pull challenges pre-review, then it will be easy for the canvassing board to put those challenges aside when it comes time for them to start the review.

So we wait. And count. And wait.

Meanwhile, here we are (in with some other stuff) on Rachel Maddow:

Nate's wrong. As usual. It will be one vote. Which would be funny. And, I get the beer.


Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/86463

Comments

1

Way to go Seminoles! ;-)

Posted by: Stacy S. | November 25, 2008 9:32 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.