Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Some people have too much time on their hands. And water. Too much water. | Main | The Monaco Declaration on Global Climate Change »

Friday Carnivalia

Category: Carnivals
Posted on: January 31, 2009 12:44 AM, by Greg Laden

image.jpg

  • Carnival of Evolution #8 is presented here, by Irradiatus

  • Four Stone Hearth: "A New Hope" Edition is HERE.

  • Not a carnival but an important, related post: Why Backlinks Matter, at Nature Blog Network.

  • Friday Ark at The Modulator

And while we are on the subject of carnivals, I'm hosting the next The Giant's Shoulders. Please get me your relevant posts by about the 14th of February.

"The Giant's Shoulders" is a monthly science blogging event, in which authors are invited to submit posts on "classic" scientific papers. Submissions are due on the fifteenth of each month, and entries will be aggregated and linked to on the host blog of the month. Links to entries should be sent to that month's host blog. What defines a "classic" paper? This depends upon the field in question, but one expects that the work should have somewhat stood the test of time: we suggest perhaps 10 years old, or more. Contributors should not only describe the research involved but also put it in a broader historical/scientific context: why is the work in question important/groundbreaking/revolutionary/nifty? It should go without saying by the use of the word "classic", but papers should be in an accepted, established scientific field: contributions promoting non-traditional science and pseudo-scientific ideas are inappropriate. Why restrict yourself to "classic" papers? Entries profiling an important person or concept in the history of science are also acceptable.

I should also note that the Scienceblogs.com 'back end' (our interface) is pretty much down for the count (upgrade = bad). I've scheduled a number of posts to come out over the next couple of days but as long as our MoveableType system is working so poorly, I'll be blogging at Gregladen.com. See you HERE.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/93786

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.