Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Important Distractions | Main | I know these are all fake, but .... »

Date-a-Clade

Category: Evolutionary Biology
Posted on: February 19, 2009 9:09 PM, by Greg Laden

From the people who brought you the Tree of LIfe:
dataclade.jpg

You can click on a node and get the info on the date of that node. Here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/100272

Comments

1

A thought occurs to me. We can trace down evolution to about 500 or 600 million years ago and that doesn't even include the single cell stuff.

This leads me to believe that on some of those rocky planets we're now starting to detect there has to be life, be it microbial, prokaryote or eukaryote, it's more than likely there.

It's a big universe. In my mind we cannot be the only so called intelligent species.

Posted by: Tony P | February 19, 2009 10:50 PM

2

Does cladistics make more sense to you over the traditional way of organizing organisms?

Posted by: Chas | February 20, 2009 12:05 AM

3

Date-a-Clade?

For a second there I thought it was referring to an intercladistic romantic relationships and dating website.

Posted by: Stephen Moore | February 20, 2009 3:07 AM

4

Marvellous; I've taken a copy for my "Desktop". I am surprised, though, that humans' closest non-primate relative is the mouse; I would have thought it would have been the sheep, particularly in New Zealand.
http://adultsheepfinder.com/

Posted by: Wayne Robinson | February 20, 2009 4:52 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.