Now on ScienceBlogs: Are testosterone-deficient men responsible for shortages of a life-saving drug for women with breast cancer?

Enter to Win

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.







Nature Blog Network



Search

Blogroll

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!
The following Wikio Widget gives a 'toplist' of science blog sites. If you feel that any one of these sites is not really a science blog site (a climate denialist site, an anti-vax site, etc.) please contact me and let me know.
Top Blogs - Sciences I also blog at Quiche Moraine, where you will find interesting restaurant reviews, political tirades, and tear jerking memories. Such as:
GLB_LOGO_180w.png

Get Facebook Buttons
Get Twitter Buttons
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
openlab08-submit.150.png



open_access_day_blog_award.jpg

Archives

Recent Posts

« Amazing Fossil Finding: Proto Whales Gave Birth on Land, not at sea | Main | Did Triceratops fight with their faces? »

How much is the world spending on neglected disease research and development?

Category: Health
Posted on: February 4, 2009 6:09 AM, by Greg Laden

ResearchBlogging.orgHow much are we actually spending on the development of pharmaceutical tools to treat HIV/AIDS, TB, leichmaniasis, malaria and sleeping sickness?

Today, PLoS Medicine Policy Forum asks this question. According to a press release from PLoS:

The first comprehensive survey of global spending on neglected disease R&D, published in this week's PLoS Medicine, finds that just over $US 2.5 billion was invested into R&D of new products in 2007, with three diseases--HIV/AIDS, TB, and malaria--receiving nearly 80% of the total. However, the survey finds that many neglected diseases, responsible for killing millions of people in developing countries, are significantly underfunded.


The George Institute report indicates that aside from the big three (HIV, TB and malaria) most other diseases receive a very small percentage of available funding.

Sleeping sickness, leishmaniasis and Chagas disease collectively received only 4.9% of total global funding; the diarrhoeal illnesses surveyed collectively received 4.5% of global funding; the helminth (worm) infections received 2%; and bacterial pneumonia and meningitis received only 1.3%. Five diseases - leprosy, Buruli ulcer, trachoma, rheumatic fever, and typhoid and paratyphoid fever - each received less than $10 million or 0.4% of total global investment. For many of these diseases, funding was not enough to create even one new product.

The George Institute study (by Moran and colleagues) was commissioned by the B&M Gates foundation. The study indicates that the US government provides about 75% of the total research funding in these areas, with the NIH providing a big chunk of that, and private sources such as Gates contributing substantial portions . Sadly, the study concludes that decisions as to where to carry out research are very much influenced by special interest groups and insufficiently influenced by a rational decision making process. Also, many of the worlds richest countries are simply not contributing to this effort a all.

This is an OpenAccess publication, and you can find it here , and there is a video here.


Source Moran, Mary, Guzman, J., Ropars, A., McDonald, A., Jameson, N., Omune, B., Ryan, S., Wu, L. (2009). Neglected Disease Research and Development: How Much Are We Really Spending? PLoS Medicine Policy Forum DOI: http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000030

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/93734

Comments

1

So, think B&M Gates intend to do anything about this?

Posted by: Felicia Gilljam | February 4, 2009 7:12 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.