Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions
profile_laden_top.jpg

If you must read only a few things today, please select from the following:

"Excuse me, there's some food in my bugs!", an exploration of human eating insects instead of the other way 'round. Also check out this related PODCAST.

You've heard the news, now find out what the scientists haven't told you because it is kinda hard to 'splain: What Happened to Our Beloved Archaeopteryx?

Why do mainstream newspapers still publish anti-evolution crank mail? Because you have not told them to refrain. Click the link and join the movement.
Congo_sidebar.jpg
An archaeological expedition to the Congo

linux_penguin.jpg
Linux

Nature Blog Network

Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

The Skeptical Search Engine

This search engine will only give you results from carefully selected skeptical and scientific sites.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Amazing Fossil Finding: Proto Whales Gave Birth on Land, not at sea | Main | Did Triceratops fight with their faces? »

How much is the world spending on neglected disease research and development?

Category: Health
Posted on: February 4, 2009 6:09 AM, by Greg Laden

ResearchBlogging.orgHow much are we actually spending on the development of pharmaceutical tools to treat HIV/AIDS, TB, leichmaniasis, malaria and sleeping sickness?

Today, PLoS Medicine Policy Forum asks this question. According to a press release from PLoS:

The first comprehensive survey of global spending on neglected disease R&D, published in this week's PLoS Medicine, finds that just over $US 2.5 billion was invested into R&D of new products in 2007, with three diseases--HIV/AIDS, TB, and malaria--receiving nearly 80% of the total. However, the survey finds that many neglected diseases, responsible for killing millions of people in developing countries, are significantly underfunded.


The George Institute report indicates that aside from the big three (HIV, TB and malaria) most other diseases receive a very small percentage of available funding.

Sleeping sickness, leishmaniasis and Chagas disease collectively received only 4.9% of total global funding; the diarrhoeal illnesses surveyed collectively received 4.5% of global funding; the helminth (worm) infections received 2%; and bacterial pneumonia and meningitis received only 1.3%. Five diseases - leprosy, Buruli ulcer, trachoma, rheumatic fever, and typhoid and paratyphoid fever - each received less than $10 million or 0.4% of total global investment. For many of these diseases, funding was not enough to create even one new product.

The George Institute study (by Moran and colleagues) was commissioned by the B&M Gates foundation. The study indicates that the US government provides about 75% of the total research funding in these areas, with the NIH providing a big chunk of that, and private sources such as Gates contributing substantial portions . Sadly, the study concludes that decisions as to where to carry out research are very much influenced by special interest groups and insufficiently influenced by a rational decision making process. Also, many of the worlds richest countries are simply not contributing to this effort a all.

This is an OpenAccess publication, and you can find it here , and there is a video here.


Source Moran, Mary, Guzman, J., Ropars, A., McDonald, A., Jameson, N., Omune, B., Ryan, S., Wu, L. (2009). Neglected Disease Research and Development: How Much Are We Really Spending? PLoS Medicine Policy Forum DOI: http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000030

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/93734

Comments

1

So, think B&M Gates intend to do anything about this?

Posted by: Felicia Gilljam | February 4, 2009 7:12 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.