Now on ScienceBlogs: A study that oversells massage therapy

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo

The Skeptical Search Engine

This search engine will only give you results from carefully selected skeptical and scientific sites.



Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« How to Tell the Difference Between Science and Bunk. Massimo Pigliucci on Atheists Talk | Main | LEGO Turing Machine »

Massimo Pigliucci v Jonathan Wells on evolution and intelligent design...

Category: Charles DarwinCreation ScienceCreationismDarwinEvolutionary BiologyIntelligent DesignReligion
Posted on: February 28, 2009 12:00 PM, by Greg Laden

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/100904

Comments

1

Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end?

Posted by: talking snake | February 28, 2009 1:42 PM

2

As a grad at Stony Brook, always a pleasure to hear Massimo Pigliucci.

Posted by: Yanni | February 28, 2009 3:58 PM

3

I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily.

Posted by: Wayne Robinson | February 28, 2009 4:25 PM

4

The only "controversy" I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design "argument by analogy" is becoming. Very very controversial.

Scientist says some science stuff...

IDer says some lame analogy stuff..

More science stuff from the scientist...

More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist...

Posted by: 386sx | March 1, 2009 2:26 AM

5

386sx: Pigliucci has a great way of cutting through the bullshit.

Posted by: Hank | March 1, 2009 9:32 AM

6

Here's a clearer copy from the makers of the show.
MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design

Posted by: Mr_Man | March 6, 2009 5:07 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.