Now on ScienceBlogs: The Heaving, Voluptuous Breasts of the IPCC Chief

Enter to Win

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.







Nature Blog Network



Search

Blogroll

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!
The following Wikio Widget gives a 'toplist' of science blog sites. If you feel that any one of these sites is not really a science blog site (a climate denialist site, an anti-vax site, etc.) please contact me and let me know.
Top Blogs - Sciences I also blog at Quiche Moraine, where you will find interesting restaurant reviews, political tirades, and tear jerking memories. Such as:
GLB_LOGO_180w.png

Get Facebook Buttons
Get Twitter Buttons
GLB_LOGO_180w.png
openlab08-submit.150.png



open_access_day_blog_award.jpg

Archives

Recent Posts

« How to Tell the Difference Between Science and Bunk. Massimo Pigliucci on Atheists Talk | Main | LEGO Turing Machine »

Massimo Pigliucci v Jonathan Wells on evolution and intelligent design...

Category: Charles DarwinCreation ScienceCreationismDarwinEvolutionary BiologyIntelligent DesignReligion
Posted on: February 28, 2009 12:00 PM, by Greg Laden

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/100904

Comments

1

Hey, Johnathan Wells, useful idiot that you are, intelligent design is not a scientific theory. Jeez, will it ever end?

Posted by: talking snake | February 28, 2009 1:42 PM

2

As a grad at Stony Brook, always a pleasure to hear Massimo Pigliucci.

Posted by: Yanni | February 28, 2009 3:58 PM

3

I think that the cambrian explosion can be explained by the development of useful eyes. Once that happened predators became much more efficient and their prey needed to have better armour to survive and fossilised more easily.

Posted by: Wayne Robinson | February 28, 2009 4:25 PM

4

The only "controversy" I see is the controversy about how lame the Intelligent Design "argument by analogy" is becoming. Very very controversial.

Scientist says some science stuff...

IDer says some lame analogy stuff..

More science stuff from the scientist...

More lame analogy stuff from the IDiologist...

Posted by: 386sx | March 1, 2009 2:26 AM

5

386sx: Pigliucci has a great way of cutting through the bullshit.

Posted by: Hank | March 1, 2009 9:32 AM

6

Here's a clearer copy from the makers of the show.
MONKEY BUSINESS: Evolution and Intelligent Design

Posted by: Mr_Man | March 6, 2009 5:07 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.