Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Science and Stimulus: Action still needed | Main | Rheas and the Birth of Evolutionary Theory »

Music and Me: The Early Years

Category: ArtBlogosphericsOther
Posted on: February 11, 2009 9:29 AM, by Greg Laden

I am the least musical person I've ever met who is still alive. Of course, most nonmusical people don't go around talking about it, so I probably actually know more tone deaf, talentless people than that. It is strange, though. I should be musical. My mother sang semiprofessionally, doing radio in the pre-WWII days before they had things on tape (commercials and stuff). My oldest sister is known as Lightning Fingers Liz, owing to her prowess with the mandolin. My brother had a rock band from something like 1968 through 1990-something and is quite talented with the lead guitar. My other sister takes the cake, though. She has a couple of PhD's in music or related topics, is an accomplished composer, and has learned--to at least a reasonable level of competence--one instrument in each known and extant class of musical instrument. (This required her to learn the bagpipes and the didgeridoo, because they are almost exclusive in their own classes.)

... read the rest here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/99530

Comments

1

So, it appears that you are the only white kid born into a black family...? Po' guy:no riddim.

Posted by: the real cacophany | February 11, 2009 11:15 AM

2

C, I haven't had a chance to check (been, as you say, BZ). We set up at Quiche Moraine for you to comment comfortably?

Posted by: Stephanie Z | February 11, 2009 11:21 AM

3

"[T]he bagpipes"!? I can think of at least five different types of bagpipes from the British Isles alone. Talking about "the bagpipes" is like talking about "the strings" - they're an entire class of instruments, some remarkably diverse.

Posted by: Dunc | February 11, 2009 11:30 AM

4

Dunc: Sort of. You'll notice I equivodated.

It is notable that all the bagpipes are called "bagpipes" and the strings are not, they are called things like "Banjo" and "Cello" and "violin" ... bowing vs. not alone may make strings more diverse than bagpipes.

But I've never seen an argument about bagpipes that did not end in a brawl. So I'll just agree with you and let it go at that.

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 11, 2009 11:58 AM

5

Steph: huh? Me comment comfortably? Is that an invitation or s/th?

I don't get what you mean--I love commenting most on the spaces that detest me and take measures against my kind of less-than-dry humor...

Posted by: the real cacophany | February 11, 2009 12:12 PM

6

The Uilleann pipes are very different to the Great Highland Bagpipes - they're fingered completely differently for one thing, they're bellows-driven, and the chanter is closed with a slide. Some types of pipes are chromatic rather than diatonic, which is a pretty major difference. It's also not really true that they're all called "bagpipes" - that's the generic English term, and many other languages have similar generic terms, but many varieties of bagpipes have specific names in the language of their originating culture. We just happened to import a bunch of specific terms for stringed instruments from other languages and cultures.

Admittedly "strings" wasn't perhaps the best analogy, as it's probably the most diverse class of instruments other than percussion.

The wikipedia list of bagpipes is quite comprehensive.

Posted by: Dunc | February 11, 2009 12:16 PM

7

I've seen the wikipedia thing, and it is quite impressive. More diversity there than I realized.

Keep in mind that this post (which is the first in a series) is a memoir of someone who grew up where there were two kinds of bagpipes: Irish and Irish. At the time, for my sister, in order for her to learn the bagpipes she had to join the Ancient Order of Hibernians Bagpipe Marching Band thingie.

The whole thing was very painful. As most things involving bagpipes are.

(ducking)

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 11, 2009 12:23 PM

8

C, I was talking mostly about being able to comment anonymously. I didn't set up the comments, and I haven't had a chance to look at them. I wasn't too worried about you being unwilling to comment when you find something you want to talk about. :)

Posted by: Stephanie Z | February 11, 2009 12:24 PM

9
At the time, for my sister, in order for her to learn the bagpipes she had to join the Ancient Order of Hibernians Bagpipe Marching Band thingie.

The whole thing was very painful.

Oh, I believe it. The Great Highland Bagpipe isn't actually a musical instrument, it's an indiscriminate weapon of war which ought to be banned under the Geneva Conventions. Nobody ever played that thing for pleasure - that's what small pipes are for. It's a terrible shame that most people's impressions of the bagpipes are formed entirely by an instrument expressly designed to make your enemies pee their kilts from two glens away.

Posted by: Dunc | February 11, 2009 12:33 PM

10

Steph: I left a comment-ary under Gregs piece about da'mayorSonny and his ever lovin'[ahem]Cher....my first album*embarassed-to-bits* was Rod Stewart...Wake up Maggie....

Posted by: the real cacaphanousupagus | February 11, 2009 12:47 PM

11

Dude, mine was Def Leppard. I wouldn't worry about it.

That is very impressive. How would you feel about me tidying it up just a bit as to punctuation and promoting it to the front page?

Posted by: Stephanie Z | February 11, 2009 12:57 PM

12

I second that emotion.

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 11, 2009 1:06 PM

13

Steph&G, I would be sincerely flattered--which isn't something that happens easily, considering that my career path consists of kissing ppls asses and other ego bits;-)
So what is the deal with that there part-time BZ blogger call anyways? Is it open post, or??

Posted by: the real sournote | February 11, 2009 4:18 PM

14

Invited guest bloggers.

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 11, 2009 4:23 PM

15

Cool, gotcha.You got the unholy trinity there already--like you guys need any help anyways;-)

Posted by: the real sournote | February 11, 2009 4:25 PM

16

C, anytime you feel like bringing something like that, let us know. Seriously.

Posted by: Stephanie Z | February 11, 2009 4:49 PM

17

thenwut?

Posted by: the real me | February 11, 2009 5:41 PM

18

Stephanie is the editor, she'll take care of everything.

Posted by: Greg Laden/Name Withheld | February 11, 2009 6:10 PM

19

OK. Believe it or not, I actually have an offline persona too, ya know, that might be read worthy;-)

Posted by: the real[....] | February 11, 2009 6:18 PM

20

It's not like I'm difficult to get ahold of.

Posted by: Stephanie Z | February 11, 2009 6:21 PM

21

O.k den. Have your way wid de writinz. You have my e-mail if U needzs mo;-)

Posted by: the real[....] | February 11, 2009 6:28 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.