Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« The Bible as Ethnography ~ 05 ~ The Virgin Birth | Main | Songbirds Fly 3 Times Faster than Expected »

Satellite Debris

Category: Cosmos
Posted on: February 15, 2009 7:47 PM, by Greg Laden

Apparently there is an argument among spaceologists as to how long satellite debris floating around the earth will stay "up there." The difference in opinion ranges from decades or a century or so on one hand to ten thousand years on the other hand . Details here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Physical Science

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/99928

Comments

1

Jeffrey Lewis over at armscontrolwonk was been on this issue for years, and has had a lot of useful commentary over there the last few days.

Posted by: Andrew Foland | February 15, 2009 8:32 PM

2

A short bit in the news was about space debris falling in Texas just in the last few days. The report hinted that it was probably from the satellite collision. I am sceptical that it would be coming down this soon.

Posted by: Cal Harth | February 15, 2009 9:22 PM

3

At what point does this become dangerous for airline flying? Debris falling from the sky, an amount consistent enough to warrant serious concern?

Posted by: Wayne | February 15, 2009 9:48 PM

4

It sounds to me like you've got the best opinion of a debris guy (Johnson) up against the statement to reporters of an ISS chief (Solovyov). All other things being equal, I'll take Johnson's numbers.

Posted by: ScienceSealedDelivered | February 15, 2009 10:15 PM

5

I assume that these bits are going slower and/or burned up before they hit the airplanes, and airplanes are going kinda slow also. But the relative velocities of space dibris still in orbit and satellites or space stations in orbit can be enormous.

Posted by: Greg Laden | February 15, 2009 11:43 PM

6

Phil Plait over at Bad Astronmy has a good write up about the collision and the recent fireball.

Posted by: CyberLizard | February 16, 2009 11:42 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.