Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Robot Dreams | Main | Jesus. He gots a flaver »

For Kitty's Beeach

Posted on: April 6, 2009 10:49 PM, by Greg Laden


A cute puppy:
beagle-puppy.jpg

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/105412

Comments

1

Cute in the same way that the airbrushed models on magazine covers are beautiful.

Posted by: dominich | April 7, 2009 4:04 AM

2

Aaaaaawwwwwwwww
Thanks Greg, I needed that.

Posted by: Kitty'sBitch | April 7, 2009 6:54 AM

3

Don't kid yourself guys: everyone knows atheists don't have feelings and are therefore unable to distinguish cute from evil. Nice try, Mr. Laden. We're on to you.

Posted by: Spiv | April 7, 2009 9:29 AM

4

I'm guessing the head has been made larger, the eyes are made larger and the features of the face have been softened. Cuteness is a biological response.

Posted by: ppnl | April 7, 2009 10:12 AM

5

Wow. That is the ugliest puppy I have ever seen. Poor thing.


It looks like some deranged photoshopist hybridized a cat and a dog.

Posted by: llewelly | April 7, 2009 11:41 AM

6

@ppnl -- you think this was photoshopped? Go out and see some real puppies; they are *crazy* cute. The "cute-response" features are incredibly exaggerated. Why go to the work of photoshopping when all you need is a camera and a bunch of puppies? See dailypuppy.com or somesuch for examples of amateur photos.

Human newborns have nothing on most animals' little ones.

Posted by: Rob W | April 7, 2009 12:26 PM

7

It is two things, chiefly:
1) The angle of the eye causes the white to show, which ever so slightly anthropomorphizes they expression in the eyes;
2) The dark smear on the muzzle (which may or may not have been digitally added), clearly mimicking a smile.

(atheist scientist mode off)

That, and it's a cuddly, soft, fuzzy widdle baby. Awwwwwww... :)

Posted by: Tom L | April 7, 2009 3:27 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.