Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« The Joy of Swearing | Main | Pretty new science news: asteroid named, chick born »

Exporting to PDF

Category: LinuxOpenSource
Posted on: May 12, 2009 9:57 PM, by Greg Laden

Most of you already know this, but just in case:

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/109278

Comments

1

PDF, the format is not proprietary. It is a standard format with an open definition such that any proprietary software manufacturer can build their own viewer or editor. In fact in the printing industry there are some strict standards for compliance quite independently of Adobe. PDF is effectively the modern PostScript.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | May 12, 2009 11:26 PM

2

It kind of raises the question of what "proprietary" means. I think Adobe controls the format. In the past the format was not entirely open or transparent, but perhaps it is now. If it is totally open then it is indeed the PS of today and I think that may well be the case, but it is not "opensource" in the sense that there is a community that can directly influence how it works or what it looks like.

I tend to agree that the format is not proprietary in any classic sense, even if a company controls the internals.

Posted by: Greg Laden | May 12, 2009 11:54 PM

3

ISO 32000-1:2008 -- all details available, and Adobe has provided a blanket patent license for necessary technology.

In theory, the ISO maintenance group (dunno offhand which that is, but I could look it up) could take the standard and do pretty much whatever with it -- but Adobe is playing nice so there's not much interest.

Posted by: D. C. Sessions | May 13, 2009 12:15 AM

4

I find one gets better results by printing to file and selecting to print directly to PDF (if that option is highlighted) or printing to PS and then using ps2pdf.

Sometimes it seems like OO is trying to optimize the PDF in the export and you get artifacts (ie, extra spacing between characters). The printing to PS/PDF (an option of the OS) seems to get around this.

YMMV

Posted by: ByteReader | May 13, 2009 12:34 AM

5

For those of us stuck with Windows products, there is
pdfcreator:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/
which allows you to print anything you can print to a pdf file.

Posted by: A | May 13, 2009 2:23 AM

6

H ere is another one:

http://www.primopdf.com/

Posted by: toby | May 13, 2009 10:57 AM

7

RE: Proprietary Format:
PDF was created by Adobe, and was a Proprietary format, until it was released to an open standard in mid-2008. (Although prior to this date, Adobe allowed for use of it's format royalty free in general)

Also - PDF and PostScript are fairly different. PostScript is actually a programming language (well page description language) - it requires devices to have an interpreter (RIP) to execute the PostScript to draw an image. PDF is a raw format. PDF uses most of what PostScript is, but has already been 'complied' (not the right term, but close enough)by RIP, require less system resources to draw/print. So in essence, yeah, PDF is just a modern PostScript (I convinced myself by writing this)...

Posted by: jj | May 13, 2009 6:55 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.