Now on ScienceBlogs: Must Read

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Ultimate Causes, Proximate Mechanisms | Main | Hanks on Stewart: Symbols, Religion, Particle Physics »

Is it true that "Sustainability will not come without reductions in consumption"?

Category: Nature conservation
Posted on: May 14, 2009 5:19 PM, by Greg Laden

Or, putting it another way,

"Why does our energy system face security and environmental challenges?"

Please visit ScienceBlog's new blog, The Energy Grid, which is one of those shorter term issue-driven blogs we do at Sb nwo and then.

This particular iteration is moderated by Jonas Meckling, from the Belfer Center, and hosted by James Hrynyshyn, who I got to know a bit at the conference last winter, and Coby Beck, both of Scienceblogs Dot Com, and a few other rather impressive looking people.

So, please go and help them save the world. Seriously. Let's get a great discussion going here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Environment

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/110046

Comments

1

This is fascinating and important information. I have long been a fan of sustainablity which, if followed to the letter of the movement, would require that our economic structure change.

Presently we pretend that our economy can always expand, this is nonsense given that the world has infinite resources.

Conservation of resources, including energy resources, even renewable energy resources, means we have to consume less, do frivolous things less, and rethink how we operate our lives. This transition would take a tremedous amount of public education and may only be possible if our current economic situation really bottoms out to the point where everyone would be forced to look at alternatives.

One of the critical elements of this line of thinking is the establishment of a local economy. Regional economic development is very important for sustainability. Regions that have some sort of logical geographical connection must find ways to support local agriculture, energy development, and transportation. The advent of local economies is a fundamental part of the "sustainability" concept.

Needless to say, all of this would require much sacrifice from a lot of people, and an entirely different perspective on how we run our lives and govern ourselves.

Bill

Posted by: bill, www.wildramblings.com | May 14, 2009 6:43 PM

2

theoretically energy cannot be created or destroyed, so i think if we wise up and use energy more efficiently we can win this battle. check out www.e3bank.com they are helping to make the shift towards sustainability. e3 Bank offers interest rate reductions for investing in green products

Posted by: chris | May 15, 2009 3:14 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.