
Probably not, but not for the reasons suggested by the subject of this excellent post by Sheril Kirshenbaum.
Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.
Looking for stuff about birds?
Lean more about lions
An archaeological expedition to the Congo
The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.
Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.
« Blogospherics | Main | Is the Upper Midwest a center for medical denialism? »
Category: feminism
Posted on: May 21, 2009 6:46 PM, by Greg Laden

Probably not, but not for the reasons suggested by the subject of this excellent post by Sheril Kirshenbaum.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/110595
denialism blog 02.14.2012
respectful insolence 02.14.2012
uncertain principles 02.13.2012
confessions of a science librarian 02.13.2012
starts with a bang! 02.13.2012
Comments
You haven't even *begun* to explore inappropriate FB photos..
;)
Posted by: Lou FCD | May 21, 2009 8:45 PM
I just read Sheril's post, and the original article by Katie Roiphie. Am I going way out on a limb here in guessing that Katie Roiphie has no children?
From her article:
I haven't noticed this specifically, but I frequently see people using photos of all sorts for their profile picture. Many of these people also change their picture frequently.She continues:
Self-effacement? Yes, there are people who like to talk about their children more than any other subject. There are also people who like to talk about Proust more than any other subject. So what? Some people also refrain from staying out drinking till five in the morning. I, for one, have been there and done that, and have little desire to do it any more.Katie goes on to say:
Aha! Yes, this indicates to me that indeed, Katie is not a parent. For myself, both of my daughters were, at some points in their lives, the center of my universe. They are beautiful, thoughtful, intelligent, etc., and they are my children, and I love them. I don't think that Katie has experienced anything quite like that.Posted by: Dan J | May 21, 2009 8:52 PM
I just read the original comments. Roiphie is in left field.
Posted by: Lou FCD | May 21, 2009 9:00 PM
Greg, those eyes don't look like normal "I'm on a carnival ride" type emotions. They look more like bloodlust, like "I'm going to swallow your soul when I get off this ride, because I hate people taking pictures of me with the fire of a thousand suns."
Looking straight... into... my soul.
Seriously. I'm going to have nightmares now.
Posted by: Jason Thibeault | May 21, 2009 9:04 PM
Stupid "error 500 - timeout" tricking me into thinking it didn't get posted.
Posted by: Jason Thibeault | May 21, 2009 9:12 PM
Jason: Every year we go to the same ride (at the State Fair) and get the picture. This way we know how long we've all been together.
But every year I act more and more complaisant. Most recent one I think I look kinda bored like I'm thinking of the grocery list. Next year I think I'll be reading a book.
Posted by: Greg Laden | May 21, 2009 9:15 PM
You could take a chessboard... :-)
http://xkcd.com/chesscoaster/
Posted by: Joel | May 21, 2009 11:25 PM
No way, man, that's photoshopped!!! Mine are real!!!
Posted by: Greg Laden | May 21, 2009 11:27 PM
what the heck thats not an appropriate who ever did this thing is stupid
(no affens)
its just a little familey riding in a rollercoster
duhh
Posted by: lexy | October 7, 2009 5:31 PM