Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Minnesotan Citizen Jury will Evaluate Recount Process | Main | Wildlife in Protected Areas Compared to Non-Protected Areas of Kenya »

Missionaries

Category: Blogospherics
Posted on: July 9, 2009 7:30 AM, by Greg Laden

Today's quiz: In what southern American city was Independence Day (July 4th) not celebrated for about 80 years, and why?

While you are working on that, have a look at this post by the Accidental Historian which is a (friendly) response to my series of posts on missionaries.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/114504

Comments

1

my guess is Vicksburg, as that was the date the city surrendered to Grant

Posted by: bwv | July 9, 2009 10:15 AM

2

my guess is Vicksburg, as that was the date the city surrendered to Grant

Posted by: bwv | July 9, 2009 10:19 AM

3

Wow. Thanks for the link. I really appreciate it.

Also, bmv, you might be right. But that doesn't mean you can't go read my posts on the Civil War, anyway...

Posted by: Geds | July 9, 2009 11:10 AM

4

Apparently, controversy touches everything. The notion that Vicksburg eschewed celebrating the fourth is called an old canard in this web piece:

http://civilwarmemory.typepad.com/civil_war_memory/2008/02/july-4-and-vick.html

Posted by: John Swindle | July 9, 2009 4:29 PM

5

Well, maybe. I went and trolled them.

Next thing you know we'll be hearing that Slavery had nothing to do with the Civil War!

Posted by: Greg Laden | July 9, 2009 4:48 PM

6

The notion that Vicksburg eschewed celebrating the fourth is called an old canard in this web piece:

It depends on how you define the terms. To the best of my knowledge there was no official 4th celebration in Vicksburg until World War II. Many Southern communities avoided official celebrations immediately after the war and during Reconstruction. That doesn't mean people didn't celebrate the 4th on their own, though.

Generally when people say, "Vicksburg didn't celebrate the 4th," they're referring to the municipality, not individual citizens of Vicksburg. Similarly, "Chicago" doesn't observe Ramadan, but many Chicagoans do.

Next thing you know we'll be hearing that Slavery had nothing to do with the Civil War!

Hold the flame war off until next week, please. I'm not as up to date on the Lost Cause Myth as I should be...

Posted by: Geds | July 9, 2009 4:59 PM

7

Aha! I knew this was going to get complicated...

Posted by: Greg Laden | July 9, 2009 5:09 PM

8

Thanks for the link to Civil War Memory. Just wanted to point out that the site has moved to www.cwmemory.com

Posted by: Kevin | July 10, 2009 5:35 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.