Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Recent Comments
- trog69 on Islamic Creationism in the News
- gwen on The First Openly Gay MLB Owner
- Dan on Islamic Creationism in the News
- Mike S. on The Mark of the Devil strikes again.
- steve on How can you tell a Christian is lying? His mouth is moving.
- Dmitri on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Mike Haubrich, FCD on Congressperson Steve Israel demands an apology from Michele Bachmann to for tacitly condoning Holocaust imagery
- Bob on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Steve on The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Azkyroth on Schools emerge as new tactic in gay marriage votes
Profile
Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.
Search
Blogroll
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Recent Posts
- The Corporation Part 14
- The First Openly Gay MLB Owner
- Islamic Creationism in the News
- The Mark of the Devil strikes again.
- Schools emerge as new tactic in gay marriage votes
- The next document I put together will be done with LyX
- Congressperson Steve Israel demands an apology from Michele Bachmann to for tacitly condoning Holocaust imagery
- Glen Beck's latest tirade. Performed by Jon Stewart
- I am a palaeontologist ... the music video
- When computers see what you see...
« Life in Biosphere 2 | Main | What I had for breakfast: Belief = Blame »
So, you think Linux is "ugly"?
Posted on: July 3, 2009 9:52 PM, by Greg Laden
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/113661
Comments
Heh heh...
Been there, done that, wore out the t-shirt!
Not only that, but I've got it all on a bootable thumb-drive.
It's snazzy enough to impress my Mac-using in-laws! (Nothing against Macs; we run Mac/Linux wireless network in our household.)
Quick tip: www.pendrivelinux.com can help you impress your friends!
Posted by: caerbannog | July 4, 2009 1:31 AM
I'm a nerd. Love me!
Posted by: The Science Pundit | July 4, 2009 1:31 AM
Hmm, so, now we've got shiny down.
Great, now get me compatibility and I'll actually consider switching.
Posted by: Alcaru | July 4, 2009 2:32 PM
Compatibility? What do you want to be "compatible" with? Windows programs? For some windows programs that I really want to use (Like Google Sketchup - come on Google, let's get a Linux version up!), I either use Wine or a virtual machine. For most tasks, I'm happy with the Linux applications that I use.
Posted by: Dan J | July 4, 2009 4:55 PM
Alcaru: compatibility with what exactly? About 80% of what's out there is directly compatible via WINE, unless you're looking for the newest video games, in which case you'd be best off paying for Crossover Office or Cedega as a compatibility layer.
And, I mean, I was able to get World of Warcraft working better under Linux than it had been running on the same box under XP, so it's not like you're not able to do it, it just takes a wee bit of effort. Until such time that adoption is high enough that development companies start providing ways to install on Linux (like iD Software did with Doom 3), these companies probably will continue to ignore that Linux users exist and are growing in numbers. The onus of responsibility for "compatibility" should be on the software companies themselves, but that won't change until adoption's high enough to hurt their bottom line.
If you're just looking to run a Windows environment within Linux, there's always VirtualBox, which lets you install a full copy of Windows within a virtualized environment.
Posted by: Jason Thibeault | July 4, 2009 4:59 PM
As with the above, what do you mean by compatibility?
On the note about it being ugly, I really find most of the snazzy new visual features of various OS to be rather ugly and distracting. I like a simple, clean look.
Posted by: Travis | July 4, 2009 8:53 PM
I know about WINE, and I really would love to use it, but I have to work a lot with autocad, solidworks and similar lesser known and painfully expensive software.
I've tried it before and it didn't work then. WineHQ tells me it hasn't gotten much better. So, I'd love to be able to use a linux, but I don't feel much for having a dual boot system.
Now, don't get me wrong, if I only used my machine as a "family PC" I wouldn't have to think twice, but untill companies like Dassault (solidworks) and autodesk (autocad) start support other OSs, or my boss decides to move to other software, I'm stuck with windows.
Posted by: Alcaru | July 5, 2009 1:02 PM
Hi Alcaru,
It seems that SolidWorks doesn't run well under Wine, but will run in a Virtual Machine.
Pro/ENGINEER from PTC is available for Linux, but is definitely not a free/open-source alternative. PTC recognizes the value of supporting the Linux platform, where AutoDesk seems not to. Oddly enough, Dassault supported Unix platforms with its CATIA V5, but dropped support for anything but Windows with its CATIA V6 release in 2008. That's a step backward in my opinion, but an economical one.
I think it all comes down to what you need your system to do. If you want to do high-end CAD work (what types of components are you working with? VLSI? Structural engineering?), you're definitely limited. If my employer required my use of specific software (outside of the workplace environment), I'd be sure they supplied said software and the required operating system (if not the hardware). If that OS was Windows, I'd be running it in a virtual machine. I do this for some web design work so that I can browse sites with various versions of Internet Explorer from within an actual Windows environment.
Posted by: Dan J | July 5, 2009 3:03 PM