Now on ScienceBlogs: The 1/6th People

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

Archives

Recent Posts

« Overheard at airport: | Main | BGR Blog Carnival will grow on you! »

World's second fastest computer

Category: Technology
Posted on: July 31, 2009 11:17 AM, by Greg Laden


(The fastest computer is the same thing but running a better operating system.)

Hat tip: Joe, copied from here.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/116146

Comments

1

Man, I just geeked out hardcore...

Posted by: jj | July 31, 2009 11:41 AM

2

Wow, that's a lot of hard drives...

Posted by: Azkyroth | July 31, 2009 2:02 PM

3

Great video!

Posted by: Sojournposse | July 31, 2009 2:08 PM

4

Does anyone want to re-build this thing and try Ubuntu on it? If so, my fees will be extraordinarily reasonable; just provide the hardware, some food and coffee, and a well-ventilated room for a day or so.

Oh, and a trampoline.

Posted by: Jason Thibeault | July 31, 2009 2:21 PM

5
Wow, that's a lot of hard drives...
Those are SSDs - solid state drives. They cost a lot more than hard drives.

Posted by: Virgil Samms | July 31, 2009 3:19 PM

6

Thanks for this post. My friend living near the Eiffel Tower may need to look into this. However, I am skeptical at drug companies and their promises. I wonder if this will be another one of those "lifetime treatments" or cures

Posted by: rap | July 31, 2009 3:32 PM

7
Those are SSDs - solid state drives. They cost a lot more than hard drives.
Ans, they do not have as high of capacity as conventional drives although this is changing. Hence all the drives, which can actually make seek/write times faster, due to using RAID. One wonders what type / how many RAID SATA (I assume not SAS) controllers are in that rig.

Posted by: jj | July 31, 2009 7:08 PM

8

Is that a critical error at time marker 2:27 I see?

Posted by: Marty | August 1, 2009 4:11 AM

9

Marty: Well spotted!

Indeed, since they never mention anything about crashes I assume they are working in full Windows Denialism Mode. (WDM) so we have to take this whole thing with a grain of salt.

Posted by: Greg Laden | August 1, 2009 8:33 AM

10

Did they do a defrag? Never defrag an SSD. Unless you want to wear it out for no performance gain.

Posted by: aporeticus | August 3, 2009 12:58 PM

11

aporeticus: This is why they should do this with Linux. There is no defrag in Linux.

Posted by: Greg Laden | August 3, 2009 1:10 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM