Now on ScienceBlogs: The Lights Stay On Inside a Black Hole!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Profile


Welcome to Greg Laden's Blog.




Nature Blog Network



Search

Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

Archives

Recent Posts

« Dear Moderate Christian | Main | The Evolutionary Anthropology of Beachcombing »

Converting Gays to Straightitude: FAIL

Category: GLBTAGender and Sexual Orientation
Posted on: August 7, 2009 2:43 PM, by Greg Laden

Clearly, the whole gay-straight thing is a false dichotomy anyway...

And the APA has decided that changing sexual orientation is impossible. That is quite a shift in policy form the days when the information about homosexuality in the psychology literature was all about "abberent" behavior or "perversion" and Teh Gay was confined, in textbooks, to the "Abmormal Psychology" volume.

Lousy Canuck and Ed Brayton have coverage and conversation on the topic.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/116683

Comments

1

...I thought it was removed from the DSM-IV back in the 80s? Like the first R?

All I have is the -TR at this point and I'm pretty sure there's no 'teh ghey' as a disorder in it.

Posted by: Spiv | August 7, 2009 3:22 PM

2

Spiv, then or a bit later in textbooks. But actually, in other lit, not so much. "Abnormal" and "perversion" are still words to be found in the 90s literature. I'm mostly aware of this from having reviewed papers and requesting that this be changed.

Posted by: Greg Laden | August 7, 2009 3:30 PM

3

Homosexuality was removed, i.e. no longer listed as a disorder, but the APA didn't make any statement concerning the efficacy or ethics of therapy to change sexual orientation. This is the first time they've made a statement regarding "conversion" therapy.

Posted by: Martin | August 7, 2009 3:45 PM

4

Aaaah. Thanks for clearing that up. I guess I got the majority of my psych education in the current century, and have been lucky enough to get only instructors who tossed in condescending comments about the silliness of it having ever been in there in the first place.

Either way declarations are good things. Sadly I still know lots of fellows who thing it's a disorder. And a few who think it's an infection of some kind. Every time a major governing body makes a good statement like this it helps to punctuate their absurdity.

I recently learned one of the last instructors I had left his wife for another man. Not that the "other man" part is importaint, but it admittedly is interesting.

Posted by: Spiv | August 7, 2009 4:12 PM

5

Don't tell that to Ted Haggard. Isn't he still going for his Masters degree in counseling to help other Christians not be gay? Someone should let him know that a degree in psychology is not for self-help.

Posted by: Eric Michael Johnson | August 7, 2009 6:48 PM

6

Does this mean that belief in 'curing gays', whether through conducting therapy or casting spells on spirits, should be covered under Abnormal Psychology? The sooner the afflicted are correctly identified, the sooner they can get the treatment they need.

Posted by: Ken Shabby | August 7, 2009 6:49 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM