Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« What makes a perfect day at the lake? | Main | How to fly using your Wii (but you have to flap fast enough) »

Boycott the Pure Sensia digital radio

Category: LinuxOpenSourceTechnology
Posted on: September 29, 2009 2:07 PM, by Greg Laden

It runs Linux as its OS. But ...

The management of the company that makes it can't say the "L-word" out loud for some reason. Which makes them either Microsoft Lackeys or Morons. Either way, would you buy a radio from them?

It might be used to run everything from PCs to power stations, but it seems some people are still a wee bit shy about using the (cough) L word.

Speaking at the launch of the touchscreen Pure Sensia digital radio, director of marketing Colin Crawford was pressed for specifics of the new device's software. But after his CEO reminded him that the new radio was based on a Linux OS, Crawford remarked: "I don't like the using the word 'Linux' on a radio."

Details

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/120638

Comments

1

I'm sitting here on my laptop running Ubuntu Linux fuming a bit (it gives me far fewer headaches than my Vista running desktop). Linux is absolutely wonderful and it's really a slap in the face of Linux developers that they use the OS and won't acknowledge it. Morons.

Posted by: Noadi | September 29, 2009 2:42 PM

2

Sounds to me like the CEO wanted to play up the Linux angle, but the marketing guy wanted to cover it up. I can kind of see where marketing guy is coming from, though I think he's wrong. But is it fair to tar the entire company management because of the marketing guy?

Posted by: lylebot | September 29, 2009 3:18 PM

3

Lylebod: Yes, until he is publicly tarred and feathered!!!

Posted by: Greg Laden | September 29, 2009 3:21 PM

4

You have to avoid nerdy connotations in things as cool as radio. Actually drawing attention to an underlying technology as if it were a feature is sad geeky to the extreme, and nobody hip enough to be associated with broadcasting would EVER do anything that lame.

Oh yeah, and this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_radio

Posted by: Funkopolis | September 29, 2009 3:33 PM

5

But... if it's both "digital" and "linux" it must be really complicated!

Posted by: Alcari | September 29, 2009 3:58 PM

6

Clearly, his objection was that there's no such thing as a "Linux OS" and he felt it should be called "GNU/Linux" instead.

Clearly.

Posted by: mewol | September 29, 2009 4:20 PM

7

If it had been running Windows I bet he would have been equally keen to avoid using that word. Pure's market is obviously people who want a nice internet radio. Anything that makes them think of their radio as a stripped-down PC is likely to put off people who really don't want another computer in their house.

(For the record, I own a Revo Pico Radiostation, and I have no idea what OS it uses.)

Posted by: csrster | September 30, 2009 7:02 AM

8

Greg, shouldn't the marketing head be tarred and gzipped instead?...

Posted by: Bob | September 30, 2009 9:08 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.