This just in from the NCSE:

Will a Massachusetts bill entitled “An Act Relative to Protecting the Religious Freedom of Students” encourage the discussion of creationism in public school science classes? That’s what a cosponsor of the bill, Representative Elizabeth Poirier (R-14th Bristol), told the Cape Cod Times (October 7, 2009). The bill, House No. 376, received a hearing on October 6, 2009, at which, according to the Times, “No one testified against the bill, which has bipartisan support and is expected to pass favorably through the Joint Committee on Education.”

Evolution is in fact not mentioned in the bill, which would require school districts in the state to “adopt and implement a local policy that allows for a limited public forum and voluntary student expression of religious views at school events, graduation ceremonies, and in class assignments, and non-curricular school groups and activities. … Districts shall treat such expression … in the same manner as the expression of a secular view. Districts are prohibited from discriminating against any student on the basis of a student’s expressed religious views.”

In commenting on a similar bill in Virginia (HB 1135 in 2008), Americans United’s Dena Sher urged legislators to amend the bill to ensure that classwork is still “graded according to academic standards of substance and relevance,” observing that otherwise “this statute could be understood to force biology teachers to give equal credit to students who, when asked questions about evolution, answer with religious views about creation.” The version of the bill that was eventually passed and enacted in Virginia was amended along the lines that Sher suggested.


Here’s some news coverage

Here’s the text of the bill

Sher’s comments on the Virginia bill

Comments

  1. #1 Joshua Zelinsky
    October 9, 2009

    Thanks. As a Mass resident this is deeply worrying.

  2. #2 joemac53
    October 9, 2009

    I have already e-mailed one of the sponsors and got a short reply (indicating the bill was harmless) and an invitation to talk to one of his staff on the phone. The news story I read in my local paper (Cape Cod Times) had so many buzz words my eyes hurt. The fact that no one spoke against the bill is just more evidence that the solons were once again asleep at the wheel.

  3. #3 MadScientist
    October 9, 2009

    “Districts shall treat such expression … in the same manner as the expression of a secular view.”

    Horseshit. So praying will be treated in the same manner as not praying? Only the goddamned religious can come up with such nonsense. The intent is probably far worse though: to put religious myths on par with science. OK, it’s time to import more muslims into Mass, let’s see how the xians feel about being free to pray when surrounded by hundreds of muslims facing Mecca and wailing.

Current ye@r *