Hat Tip Julia
Greg Laden's Blog
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Looking for stuff about birds?
Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.
Lean more about lions
An archaeological expedition to the Congo
The Skeptical Search Engine
The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.
Recent Comments
- Donald Iljazi on What is Markdown and why use it?
- freewebcoach.org on Changing the rep of Fungi one mushroom-based robot thingie-builder at a time
- Greg Laden on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
- Charles on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
- Greg Laden on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
- Greg Laden on Seismic Activity at Yellowstone
- Connie Davis on Who has a higher IQ, cats or dogs?
- lynda on Seismic Activity at Yellowstone
- lynda on Seismic Activity at Yellowstone
- Don Parnell on The grey squirrel from a birder's point of view
Search
Profile
Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.
Recent Posts
- Looking for stuff about birds?
- Environmentally Friendly Hard Drive Case
- Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882
- Whitney Houston has died
- Lions!
- Changing the rep of Fungi one mushroom-based robot thingie-builder at a time
- More Mississippi Meanderings
- Is climate change a leftist scientific conspiracy to destroy America?
- Oldest Animals Discovered in Namibia
- Wild Mississippi
Blogroll
If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*- 10,000 Birds
- Alpha Meme
- a Nadder!
- Angry by Choice
- Armchair Dissident
- (((Billy))) The Atheist
- blogfish
- blogSci
- Blond Nonbeliever
- Blue Lion Blog
- Bug Girl's Blog
- Camels with Hammers
- Catalogue of Oganisms
- Cassandra's Tears
- Class M Planet
- Cocktail Party Physics
- Counter Minds
- Cranky Linguist, The
- Crowded Head, Cozy Bed
- Dead Racist Society
- Deep Sea News
- Dispersal of Darwin
- Divine Afflatus
- Dread Tomato Addiction
- Evil is Underrated
- Evolved and Rational
- Evolving in Kansas
- Evolving Thoughts
- Fellman Studio Blog
- Flying Trilobite
- Further Thoughts
- Hoxful Monsters
- ICBS Everywhere
- Illusory Tenant
- It's Alive!!
- Jafcisa
- Letters from a Broad
- Life Before Death
- Looking For Detachment
- Matharu's Rants and Raves
- Mors dei
- Natural Reckonings
- Nature Blog Network
- Providentia
- Qeyḥ bāḥrī
- Quiche Moraine
- Religion, Sets, and Politics
- Sandwalk
- Sarah Zielinski
- Science Notes
- The Seething Primate
- Skepchick
- Spanish Inquisitor
- Splendid Elles
- Survival Machine
- Synapostasy
- TalkOrigins
- Tangled Up in Blue Guy
- Tetrapod Zoology
- The Flying Trilobite
- The Inoculated Mind
- The Intersection
- The Loom (new)
- The Scientific Activist
- The Unexamined Life..
- The Zone
- Thinking for Free
- Think Progress
- Three Toed Sloth
- Toomanytribbles
- Traumatized by Truth
- Truth Is a Woman
- udreamofjanie
- Uncommon Liberty
- View from the Pond
- Vickie Henderson Art
- When Pigs Fly Returns
- Writer's Daily Grind
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
« Don't ask, don't tell, don't wait much longer. | Main | Australia: Proof that there is no god »
Dawkins on O'Really
Category: Atheism • Creation Science • Creationism • Intelligent Design • Religion • Republicans
Posted on: October 11, 2009 10:19 AM, by Greg Laden
Find more posts in: 
Humanities & Social Science
Humanities & Social ScienceTrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/122027
Comments
Just think how much further we'd be towards the 'how did it start' if everyone working on the question didn't have to deal with militant belief in fairy tales.
Posted by: Rich Wilson | October 11, 2009 11:03 AM
Holy shit Billo's a fucking jackass. I mean seriously - I haven't met Dawkins in person, but know a few people who have and I have seen him both in person and on a few interviews. I get the very distinct impression that is a just not in his nature to lose his cool - yet there's Billo, pressing him to do just that.
Of course I can't imagine trying to stave off such a concentration of the stupid.
Posted by: DuWayne | October 11, 2009 11:08 AM
In his talk at Berkley (http://www.atheistmedia.com/2009/10/richard-dawkins-at-berkeley.html) Dawkins says the Kirk Cameron was originally supposed to be on the show as well.
I think Dawkins should make 'no questions from the last book' a prerequisite to interviews. Surely he's having no trouble getting word out about the book. And this insistence on debating the last book has to be tiring.
Posted by: Rich Wilson | October 11, 2009 12:02 PM
I wonder what the correct words are to say to people like O'Really, to get them to understand their lack of logic. He is trying to say that because science doesn't have evidence for everything, science class can then present ideas that don't have any evidence. How can he not see the illogical jump that he has made.
I completely agree with him that science must have evidence to be presented in science class, but then how can he say that religion doesn't need evidence to be presented in science class. A lack of consistency is one of the easiest types of logical errors to notice, so why can't he see it?
Posted by: Jordan G | October 11, 2009 1:05 PM
Posted by: Dan J | October 11, 2009 3:55 PM
I find it remarkable, although not surprising, when this accusation of dogma and/or fascism is levelled at science. It really cuts to the core of the problem, because people like O'Reilly neither know nor care how science is actually practised. The only ideology they know how to deal with is one of centralized authoritarianism, and so they have deep conceptual problems with belief systems which do not operate that way. Therefore, they assume that because science states its case so clearly, it must also be centralized and authoritarian. They never read Nature or Science, so they don't see that what looks like hard and fast fact is actually only the best explanation so far. Or if they do see it, they don't care, because arguing, vociferously, from authority has been all they have ever known, and therefore, if there are gaps, all that's required to fill them is someone who can shout out louder fairytales than the other guy. Sad really.
Posted by: daen | October 12, 2009 11:43 AM
What I find unacceptable from Oreilly is the way he destroys rational discourse by pre-supposing a dichotomy with an Us\them entrenchment: Atheist vs religion.. Who ever said faith and science are mutually exclusive? The only rational thing Oreilly said was that science cannot provide the moral teaching that he assumes only religion can.But even there Oreilly is wrong because it has been scientifically proven that morality can exist and even thrive without religion.
Like many have said: I must credit Dawkin's lucid and well reasoned responses to Orelilly's nonsense.
Posted by: dalani | October 12, 2009 12:10 PM