I just received a mass emailing from Julia's high school, in the name of the principal. Routine business. At the end of the missive was this quote:
A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell where his influence stops.
What does this quote mean to you? If you don't know its context, you may be in for a surprise.
You see this quote all the time on K-12 educational material as a header, footer, slogan, logo, inspirational message, and so on. It obviously means something good about teachers. Maybe something good about education. The quote is by Henry Adams and comes from his book "The Education of Henry Adams" which sounds an awful lot like a title for a porn movie. Since this is a book, first circulated in 1907, about education it must be the case that this quote refers to the positive power of educators back then, and presumably, now. Right? Certainly that is the meaning that is usually attributed to it.
A Google search of
"A teacher affects eternity"
... yields 272 thousand hits, many of which are examples of the term's use as an inspirational maxim in one or another dialog about education. So clearly people are in tune with the positive message of Henry Adam's sentence.
A Google search of
"A teacher affects eternity" -adams
... (thus leaving off a direct reference to Henry with the minus sign in front of 'adams') yields about 59 thousand hits and I'll wager almost every one represents the use of the quote as a positive maxim in the dialog about education. One teacher uses the phrase as the title for a web site on teaching. Via Google I find the phrase tweeted on Twitter, and checking directly with Twitter, we find forty recent instances over the last 10 days (older tweets are not available). In fact, it does not matter when you check Twitter. If you search for this phrase, there will be about forty instances over the most recent ten hours or so. Four times an hour someone tweets "A teacher affects eternity" and sometimes gives the rest of the quote, sometimes mentions it's Henry Adams'. But they always seem to mean it to be a nice thing to say about teachers and about how important they are.
You can buy note cards or posters with the phrase, and since I live in a teacher's house, I can attest that people tend to embroider the phrase or a version of it on pillows and print it in shadow boxes and on little signs held by teddy bears. Which they give to the teacher as a way of saying that they like teachers.
The Education of Henry Adams (the book not the porn film) is a complex work that I will not try to characterize, but at least in part I take it as a literary act of cynicism. Adams speaks of himself in third person and by the time we get to the quote in question he is discussing Henry's first nine months as an Assistant Professor in History at Harvard.
For the next nine months the Assistant Professor had no time to waste on comforts or amusements. He exhausted all his strength in trying to keep one day ahead of his duties. Often the stint ran on, till night and sleep ran short. He could not stop to think whether he were doing the work rightly. He could not get it done to please him, rightly or wrongly, for he never could satisfy himself what to do.
Henry thinks of himself as inadequate, not up to the job, apparently.
But part of the problem was with Harvard itself, and its inattention to quality education.
The fault he had found with Harvard College as an undergraduate must have been more or less just, for the college was making a great effort to meet these self-criticisms, and had elected President Eliot in 1869 to carry out its reforms. Professor Gurney was one of the leading reformers, and had tried his hand on his own department of History. The two full Professors of History -- Torrey and Gurney, charming men both -- could not cover the ground. Between Gurney's classical courses and Torrey's modern ones, lay a gap of a thousand years, which Adams was expected to fill. The students had already elected courses numbered 1, 2, and 3, without knowing what was to be taught or who was to teach. If their new professor had asked what idea was in their minds, they must have replied that nothing at all was in their minds, since their professor had nothing in his, and down to the moment he took his chair and looked his scholars in the face, he had given, as far as he could remember, an hour, more or less, to the Middle Ages.
In other words, the History Department at Harvard was a mess, a chain of rusty links of which Henry himself was the weakest. Henry Adams does not think the teachers at Harvard were doing what needed to be done, the system of education was not doing what was required, and the students were probably being damaged more than assisted by participating in this system. And this worried him.
Not that his ignorance troubled him! He knew enough to be ignorant. His course had led him through oceans of ignorance; he had tumbled from one ocean into another till he had learned to swim; but even to him education was a serious thing. A parent gives life, but as parent, gives no more. A murderer takes life, but his deed stops there.
In other words, all those important people in your life: Your mom, a person who kills you, and so on, have only limited effects on you as a person. But, according to Henry Adams,
A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell where his influence stops.
OMG. That sounds like bad news. The system of education sucks, the professors suck, the students are getting the shaft, and this will affect the students for their whole lives, and through them society in general, and the course of history itself. Bad teaching, Henry Adams is telling us, ruinz everything for everybody!
But this is not what people think is happening, is it?
A teacher is expected to teach truth, and may perhaps flatter himself that he does so, if he stops with the alphabet or the multiplication table, as a mother teaches truth by making her child eat with a spoon; but morals are quite another truth and philosophy is more complex still. A teacher must either treat history as a catalogue, a record, a romance, or as an evolution; and whether he affirms or denies evolution, he falls into all the burning faggots of the pit. He makes of his scholars either priests or atheists, plutocrats or socialists, judges or anarchists, almost in spite of himself. In essence incoherent and immoral, history had either to be taught as such -- or falsified.
From here Adams goes on to an interesting discussion that misunderstands (modern) evolution, and very rightly laments the thorn that the Middle Ages is in the side of western civilization. And in that discussion he reiterates that while all this is interesting stuff, it is not what is taught to the students. Because the teachers, really, don't have a clue as to how to interpret the material they are responsible to cover or how to convey it to their pupils.
Here is Henry Adam's famous quote translated into modern parlance:
Be careful. The system of education is inadequate, and a half baked attempt to educate is dangerous. A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell how badly fucked up everything will be when he is done with it.
I had always seen the quote as what most people seem to see to as: The nice phrase you embroider on the pillow and give to your favorite teacher. My friend Josh Borowicz, who happens to be an historian and a Henry Adams scholar, pointed this interesting irony out to me, several months ago. I vowed at that time to blog about it. And now I have.
You can read the full text of The Education of Henry Adams here.









Comments
So you can take Adams' quote at the value you've added to it, that teachers do more harm than good to the subjects that they are teaching, and you can attempt to move from there. What if they didn't teach? What if there were no teachers? The amount of information that exists approaches infinity, but if we touch that information we damage it? The Schroedinger's Cat experiment of information and or teaching?
This sounds more like the frustration of one man to define the goals of teaching that he desires most, and so he laments more that he can't define those goals than he does about what he has or has not done.
Is it worth reading more of his book?
Posted by: JayK | October 27, 2009 12:20 PM
'...part of the problem was with Harvard itself, and its inattention to quality education.'
Hmm, must still be a problem. After all, Greg Laden went to Harvard, and he apparently came away not knowing the difference between "its" and "it's".
Posted by: Elvira Von Snark | October 27, 2009 12:35 PM
In my mind this is not about whether or not teachers are useful, but about misusing the quote. I think the point is that since teachers can affect "eternity", they better be aware of the impact they have on their students. They also should be wary of teaching the many lies that are currently taught. cough... Texas public schools. ...cough
Posted by: JRo | October 27, 2009 12:43 PM
JayK: It is worth reading the whole book (it's short, anyway). The thing is, this is the writing of a man with his first college teaching job at a college that had not been doing a very good job at teaching in a century where teaching the gentry was not considered too necessary. The book itself came out 100 years ago, and he was writing about experiences from much earlier. Like so many other 19th century writings, the right wing and libertarian movements have taken TEOHA as a source of criticism of modern schools (K-12 mainly) even though this is grades and decades and paradigms away along various dimensions.
Posted by: Greg Laden | October 27, 2009 1:18 PM
JRo: word.
Posted by: Greg Laden | October 27, 2009 1:26 PM
Eh, I think don't think they're taking the quote out of context, since it serves both as an encouragement and to remind teachers of their awesome responsibility. It's like how the phrase "first do no harm" is associated with doctors. I'd like to think most teachers are aware that they can affect "eternity" for good or ill, depending on how well they do their jobs. I think that meaning is contained within the quote itself even without further context.
Posted by: H.H. | October 27, 2009 2:05 PM
HH: That may well be. Which means, when the school principal uses it on her email stationary, I can take is a threat.....
(And appropriately so.)
But .. I'm pretty sure most people who give each other t-shirts like the above are not thinking what you suggest they are thinking. It is easy to tell by both the iconography and the context. But then, every teacher at several points probably does think about it the way you suggest, and I would imagine, wonders if the parent of the kid s/he helped so much two years back who gave the gift of an embroidered pillow was thinking of the phrase the same way as the teacher does in those darker moments...
Posted by: Greg Laden | October 27, 2009 2:46 PM
JayK- have you read A People's History of the United States or Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong?
Yeah, teachers all struggle with curriculum decisions. But this strikes me as going beyond that, and I think any history teacher who has never worried about the implications of 'history is told by the winners' isn't a good one.
Posted by: becca | October 27, 2009 3:55 PM
At some point every semester that my daughter is in History class, I try to contrive it so that she is walking around with A People's History long enough for the teacher to see it... or for her to quote from it, or something.
Posted by: Greg Laden | October 27, 2009 3:59 PM
@2: Greg's use of "its" is correct. It is the possessive form which is called for in the context. "It's" is a contraction of "it is" which would make no sense in the context.
Posted by: Hal | October 27, 2009 7:36 PM
This was a very cool read--thanks! I had no idea of the history behind this.
Posted by: bug_girl | October 27, 2009 9:22 PM
Elvira von Snark @2 must be a master of her craft to have created such an epic bit of snark that backfired so spectacularly. It must have been a slow day, because that was my laugh of the day.
Posted by: Jason Thibeault | October 27, 2009 9:34 PM
I love the home-schooling tag! Now, that's snark.
Posted by: frog | October 27, 2009 11:39 PM
Bug-girl, I have no idea why your comments are always moderated.
Posted by: Greg Laden | October 28, 2009 3:32 AM
Thanks Becca, I actually hadn't read "Lies my teacher.." yet. It's on its way.
Posted by: JayK | October 28, 2009 11:08 AM
I suspect the reason for the home schooling tag is that this text ("The education...") is part and parcel of the pro-homing schooling literature.
Posted by: Elaine | October 28, 2009 1:18 PM
Yes, the quote is "part and parcel" of pro-homeschooling literature - although the ones most likely to embroider it on a cutesy t-shirt would probably capitalize the "e": "A teacher affects Eternity." Personally, I'd like to see the "First, do no harm" homeschool t-shirt catch on.
Posted by: Lynn | October 28, 2009 7:32 PM
The comments on this blog post suggest that who Henry Adams was, including who he was when he became that young history teacher at Harvard, is a bit unknown. A simple Wikipedia search fills in most of the biographical picture, and would only (I think) reaffirm Greg Laden's point: In The Education Adams warns that the prime lesson of historical studies is chaos (a word Adams finds useful in The Education), although he qualifies this chaos in two ways.
First, while the big mass of historical data can't sustain itself as a big picture of history, because narrative fails in the face of the mysteries of cause-and-effect, we can however discover a lot about human nature, including the natures of particular players in history -- men and women exercise their characters in life, and to degrees we can puzzle those lives out of the murk of context.
Second -- and here's where Adams, to me at any rate, survives as a theorist of history -- we can across time see how mankind variously reacts to the mysteries of history, and draw out some principles on the same. What we get instead of history-as-narrative, then, is history-as-psychology, more or less. His point about history, in The Education, is that mankind forever has bet his dollar on that notion of How Things Are that is most likely to satisfy his desires for power, victory, comfort, whatever. And as religions or theories or ideologies or whatever, of How Things Are, shift or evolve or change, mankind's narratives of history change, too. Explanations change, and resift the data; the data resists, the explanations fail or fade, and other forms of explanation struggle to fill the void. From the first shadows of cultures emergent from pre-history to Marxism and beyond.
Void, or lack of explanation, or lack of a Rhyme and Reason, is the historian's real lesson, but it is also a lesson that cannot be taught because it is destructive to the preservation of social optimism, of forward momentum, of a young person's, a young student's, hope for a normal life, including therein a fecund life.
He was, by the time he wrote The Education, deeply impressed by what we can recognize as the modern sciences, which from evolutionary biology to cosmology to atomic physics, all hammered home the fact, rich with implication, that nothing in the universe responds to our desires, that the chronicle of our species is insignificant and fantastically abbreviated, and that, as evolutionary animals, the real cause-effect that rules us -- our real history -- is the random-ness that measures out the "history" of life.
In very certain ways, in The Education he worries over the shocks to the human imagination, including to human morale (the fighting esprit, if you will, of human culture[s]), when historical narrative is declared a dead letter. The past, he knows, contains evidences of the great beauty, the great moral energy, the heroism, and so on, that mankind is capable of, when, that is, mankind is motivated by historical purpose, when mankind lives inside a story that promises meaningfulness of some relevant kind.
The Education of Henry Adams, by the way, is NOT short. It is cynical, but also quite witty, and deeply emotional in ways both large and small -- not an easy combination to pull off.
Posted by: Avent | October 31, 2009 12:07 PM
I beg to differ gentlemen but aren't you missing the obvious? Adams urged keeping one foot in the real world as well as research for the very reason that it may not be led astray.
"when mankind lives inside a story that promises meaningfulness of some relevant kind" - Avent
What is that story of purpose for Adams? He's actually very clear what it was and, though politically incorrect today, it may be even more relevant to us for the next 100 years in many similar ways. It was the expansion of the Anglo-American empire to bring order out of the chaos. He revels in the triumphs of close friends John Hay and Henry Cabot Lodge who jointly contolled American foreign policy during Teddy Roosevelt's administration as S of S and the chairman of the Senate Forign Relations Committee.
Lodge was his student and eventually co-editor at Harvard and obviously had a direct hand in changing critical world events. That puts a damper on the theory that a teacher cannot have massive influence on world events through the pupil and may in fact be one of education's greatest examples of it.
He also marvels that his own family had been so influential for 150 years in the outcome of that world changing partnership of great powers. Ironic as it is that he trashes Anglo-American culture at nearly every occasion he can see that the rapid progression of technology will only give rise to more treacherous empires if not checked, namely Russia, Germany, and eventually Japan and China.
He could not foresee that the terrorist bombings he dreaded in Paris would wreak havoc on his own country 100 years later. An Islamo-fascist invasion of sorts on America's shores was inconcievable in an era before the successful "airship" his friend Samuel Langley had failed to invent could skip across continents like his 30 mph Mercedes Benz on the first smooth roads of France.
He learned that history was chaos but that occasionally a great power could arise and improve the lot of many when he studied his model's (Gibbon) "Rise" and though he wept upon the steps of the Ara Coeli in Rome at the thought of the evolution of man receding backwards into the oblivion from whence it came, his greatest fears were proven unfounded as the new Anglo-American empire emerged triumphant after WW I.
Posted by: Sir Donald | November 22, 2009 9:40 PM
"I beg to differ gentlemen"..."Anglo-American empire"...Sir Donald? All right, who ordered the time capsule?
Donald, whose improved lot did you have in mind, and how much of their industry has gone toward providing the English and Americans their current disposable culture?
Posted by: Stephanie Z | November 22, 2009 9:58 PM
I'm terribly sorry I thought this thread was about the lessons of history not the folly of political correctness. Adams would have applauded your criticism of the weaknesses of American culture but they have so far proven to be the lesser of many evils that stalk the survival of the world, unless of course you believe in human-caused global warming or other pseudo-scientific apocalyptic propaganda.
See the defeat of Nazi Germany, imperialist Japan, the Soviet Union, and eventually Islamo-fascism. Follow that with studying the undeniable spread of democracy across the globe and a rising standard of living in developing countries and only the hopelessly biased, or maybe the leader of communist China, would dismiss the contribution of the Anglo-American empire the Adams family worked so hard to build. That is the central story of purpose in western history. The rest is chaos fit for the asylum.
It may be on the decline, as all empires similarly suffered, but if something better does not supplant it and carry on its principles then the lessons of history will have been lost upon the stupefied masses of the world once again. Don't hold your breath for a new world order anytime soon. Once China and its sycophants implode under the weight of their unsustainable totalitarian political system the basic principles of democratic capitalism will shine forth ever brighter.
Posted by: Sir Donald | November 23, 2009 1:30 AM
Please also see Adams undying support for women's rights beginning with the franchise long before it was fashionable and the Anglo-American empire championed them across the four winds. He regularly thumbed his blue blood nose at many of the political stances of his own priveleged class.
Posted by: Sir Donald | November 23, 2009 1:57 AM
That puts a damper on the theory that a teacher cannot have massive influence on world events through the pupil and may in fact be one of education's greatest examples of it.
Good thing I didn't say that, good thing this was not the point of the post, or we'd be all wet.
if something better does not supplant it and carry on its principles then the lessons of history will have been lost upon the stupefied
Here here.
Posted by: Greg Laden | November 23, 2009 7:14 AM
Seems on par with "First thing we do, is kill all the lawyers."
Which is quoted as a good idea, when it comes as words from a scoundrel's mouth.
Posted by: Samantha Vimes | November 23, 2009 7:48 AM