From an “unknown greater good” to “evil is necessary to prove God’s existence” it’s all a lot of hooey and post hoc justification.

August Berkshire has a new version of his list, here.

Comments

  1. #1 Dandi144
    November 17, 2009

    Wow. Unbelievably turgid arguments, based throughout on a lack of differentiation between “evil” and “suffering”, between the existence of a hypothetical divinity and his moral nature. I’m not trying to take a position one way or the other. Just pointing out that, while there may be some good points to be made here, the development of those points is unbelievably sloppy.

Current ye@r *