I agree with almost nothing substantive that he says but many people find the discussion interesting:
- Log in to post comments
Advertisment
I agree with almost nothing substantive that he says but many people find the discussion interesting:
rambling on....
I couldn't take more than 4 minutes.
He's only noticed contradictions lately? If he'd read started with Genesis, he'd find two creation stories, one where man is created before the animals, and in the other man was created after the animals.
If that wasn't enough, the fact that Exodus never happened should have cured his religiousness.
Here's something much more interesting.
Pat Condell, Agressive Atheism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjO4duhMRZk
Joel, I stopped watching as soon as I heard, "Religion can dish it out, but it can't take it." Religion is not a person, it is an idea that many humans buy into. Treating religion as a single entity is a less than subtle way of painting all religious people with the same brush. It's raw stereotyping, and you shouldn't put up with it for any group of people, even a group you don't approve of.