Now on ScienceBlogs: Oldest Human-Made Object in Space

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« My bell is bigger than your bell | Main | Nyamulagira Volcano and Human Evolution »

Question with boldness even the existence of a God;

Category: Atheism
Posted on: January 4, 2010 2:26 PM, by Greg Laden

.. because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homepage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.

- Thomas Jefferson

Homepage of reason? Did he really say that?


Perhaps he was referring to this.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/128385

Comments

1

I think he said "homage," not " homepage.

Posted by: kristi | January 4, 2010 2:36 PM

2

OK, disregard that, I should have clicked the link first!

Posted by: kristi | January 4, 2010 2:40 PM

3

gotcha

Posted by: Greg Laden | January 4, 2010 3:02 PM

4

That would have been awesome! :-)

Posted by: Stacy | January 4, 2010 3:38 PM

5
That would have been awesome! :-)
And prophetic.

Posted by: Berlzebub | January 4, 2010 4:27 PM

6

The fact that it was found a Wiki site suggests it can be misread to mean whatever we want it to mean.

Posted by: Ben | January 4, 2010 5:08 PM

7

I would be more impressed if the page didn't have such a misleading caption on page 1. Any casual research in a decent library or online would quickly reveal that;
A) the Vatican routinely signs concordats with secular governments and it usually has to do with a new or changing interaction ranging from how bishops are selected to tax status
B)Concordats have been forged since, oh, the 11th Century
C) The Concordat certainly did NOT "... effectively legitimiz[ed] Hitler and the Nazi government to the eyes of Catholicism, Christianity, and the world." The Nazis were legitimized by two little somethings called the German Federal Election of 11/1932 and the parliamentary process where a bit more than 33% of Germans voted for the Nazi Party and a coalition government made Hitler Chancellor. This led to the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act, resulting in a change in how Germany conducted foreign relations and leading to the Concordat - as well as agreements with the dozens of ambassadors from places like the USA and UK who had already been dealing with Hitler, etc.

So, the caption gets it backwards - the Vatican needed a new Concordat because of the Nazis winning an election. Way to impress a visitor! Sure, the fact that my father writes books on German WWII history helps, but my father is also an atheist.

Posted by: Aquinas Dad | January 5, 2010 12:48 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.